What I find interesting is that, before the 1920’s, tanning …

Comment on Skin Colour is Not a Fashion Statement (And no, we won’t “get a tan…”) by Theresa.

What I find interesting is that, before the 1920’s, tanning was considered vulgar because it meant you were working class and got it from your job. The whiter your skin, the richer and more delicate you were. I don’t know that I would say we should return to this extreme either, but I think telling someone they have to tan is wrong. An skin color can be fashionable; you just have to wear colors that compliment it (unless you really don’t care, in which case, wear what you want!) Plus, pale people have the advantage of never worrying about tan lines 🙂

Recent Comments by Theresa

Style Trial | Julianne Moore’s hairy dress (plus more photos from the Cannes Film Festival)
I think my biggest beef with this dress is that she doesn’t have much of a shape in it.


Iris Van Herpen X United Nude Biopiracy Boots: the strangest shoes ever?
I give it a week before Lady Gaga goes somewhere in these…


WEAR or DIE? | Cut-out dress edition
As hideous as it would be on me, I would go with A, because I’d rather have people judge me for cellulite while still covering all the important bits than have people witness a wardrobe malfunction in which both of my considerably sized breasts could pop out at any moment.


Wear or Die | Ashish Fall 2014 Edition
B is prettier. I think it is avant garde in an almost pretty way, rather than just a giant denim sea thing.


Wear or Die | Big Bird or Daffy Duck?
I guess B, because it doesn’t look as hot. But really all I can say to these two is LOL.


Comments are closed.