What do you call sheer shorts? Shhorts, of course!

We think the word “shorts” is a bit ambitious in this case, Haider Ackermann. We’re going to  call these “Shhorts” instead.

And this?

We’re going to call this view “an abomination.”

Seriously, folks: if what you’re wearing under your clothes is more visible than the clothes themselves, then you cannot be said to be “wearing clothes”. You are not “dressed”.  You are THE EMPEROR. (You’ve also just been scammed out of £285, which is what these shhorts cost, but that’s a matter for the Daylight Robbery division to investigate.)

Disagree? That’s OK, Emperor: just click here to buy your shhorts…


  • September 23, 2010


    That is ridonkulous! OMG! Bwahahahahaha

    View Comment
  • September 24, 2010


    I’ll call this the empress new clothes… hahahaah…

    View Comment
  • September 24, 2010


    I was going to comment the post above this one (with the dress of the day – LOVE it!) but the comments were closed on that one. Nevertheless, love these shorts!

    …KIDDING! They’d be horrible even if they weren’t sheer but like this they are possibly the nastiest shorts I’ve ever seen (and thank God that haven’t even them ‘in person’, that would be much much worse..)

    View Comment
  • September 24, 2010


    omg these are just plain hideous! What the hell were they thinking?

    View Comment
  • September 26, 2010


    lol. total yuck, i just love the name you gave them! xx

    View Comment
  • September 28, 2010

    Rock Hyrax

    OK, here’s my theory: there is an underground network of fetish clubs (where people wear this stuff intead of the usual rubber etc), open only to those who can afford spend £100s on this type of non-clothing.

    Either that or these things are just advertised as a joke. Can anyone else come up with a more plausible explanation?

    View Comment
  • September 29, 2010


    Fetish club is about the only plausible explanation I think….

    View Comment