Comment on All eyes on your ugly pants… by Jaynie.
Somehow I just *knew* these would be hideously expensive. Oh, humanity. What has become of you?
Recent Comments by Jaynie
Three So-Called Wardrobe Essentials you *DON’T* have to own
Wardrobe essentials lists in general strike me the same way as I think the OMGITSDESIGNER people strike you — I feel like they’re targeted at people who haven’t really got a good sense of their own style so they’re willing to do what they’re told. A lot of these lists are filled with bland, plain clothing in neutral colours, not because these are the most fashionable or flattering things you could wear, but because they’re hard to screw up. (That’s not to say that some of these essentials don’t look good on some people, btw.)
80s fashion makes another comeback
Why can’t we ever resurrect a nice decade? The 40s? The 50s? The 20s, even?
How often do you wash your jeans?
Mine usually last for a good week until I’ve trekked through too much mud and too many puddles to really look presentable in them. If I was less inclined to fall over and generally make a mess of myself, I’d probably keep them on longer, but being knee-high in caked on mud is…not a good look.
Style on Trial: Noomi Rapace mixes spots and stripes at the premiere of Sherlock Holmes
I agree that it would look better with smaller polka-dots. Actually I think it would have been most lovely with no polka-dots at all, just a solid brown bodice, but then, I don’t quite understand fashun either!
Is it offensive? Drop Dead Clothing’s “Anorexic” Model
I agree that there is something gross about calling another person’s body offensive. It’s her body, and I don’t know anything about her, so I can’t make a judgement about whether or not she is healthy.
I would, however, ask what kind of message the advertisers thought they were sending. Whether or not it’s actually true, many people are going to read this woman as anorexic, and would therefore more likely be put off the clothing — or take it as aspirational. There isn’t a clear statement (I could see using very very thin models in an artistic critique of standards of beauty) and there isn’t a reason they couldn’t have used a model that wouldn’t be read by most people as being too thin. (And since there is already a dearth of averagely-sized women in advertising, it isn’t like they’re catering to a neglected market). I just think it’s bad judgment on the part of the advertisers.
But banning it, like you said, is only going to give it more attention. Better, I think, to create some sort of incentive / law that gets advertisers to use a a wider range of models, so that people who are susceptible to advertising can see that a size 16 is as beautiful and desirable as a size 00, etc.