Too Much Information? Lace shorts by House of Holland

Don’t worry, readers: we know what you’re thinking, but it’s OK, these House of Holland shorts are only SEMI-sheer. Which means it would be perfectly acceptable to wear them like this:

Well, it would if you were a plastic mannequin, that is. If you’re an actual human being, we’d suggest the Fashion Police might be the least of your worries if you went out like this. If you want to risk it anyway, head over to Browns: the shorts are £210, and you can buy the rest of the outfit there too while you’re at it. (Note the Peep Toe Boot Rule is being observed here: nice one, Browns.)

7 Comments

  • […] read more Share and Enjoy: […]

    View Comment
  • June 9, 2010

    Amee

    Peep toes and a crop top! I’m glad they made this monstrosity easy to identify.

    View Comment
  • June 10, 2010

    tallilah

    they have lining underneath, but because the lining is in tan i does look to bare. Maybe in another color. They also look a bit like sleepwear. I say a fashion DONT! But that’s just my opinion…

    View Comment
  • June 10, 2010

    Bayonetta

    There’s a lining underneath, but if you wanted to horrify some people in public . . .

    View Comment
  • June 10, 2010

    Roz

    The only person to get away with this – and not even then, would have been Edwina in Absolutely Fabulous…. otherwise WRONG< WRONG< WRONG lock it up!

    View Comment
  • June 10, 2010

    Melanie

    ignoring the fact that they are sheer – that’s over 200 quid for a pair of elasticised waist boxer shorts! complete with botton-fly flap no less.

    the sheerness of them just adds to the madness. a civilian couldn’t possibly wear them out the front door.

    View Comment
    • June 10, 2010

      Carrie

      I’m pretty sure that the fly is fake, and just a bit of black; there appears to be no real closure from the exterior.

      This theory of them being boxers is strengthened by the ELASTIC WAIST. WHY?

      View Comment