We don’t know what happened to Natasha Alam’s breasts here, but it must’ve been something bad to make them so desperate to escape the confines of her dress… In fact, at first glance we thought this was an attempt to re-create the infamous Topless Wedding Dress for the red carpet:
Nice day for a topless wedding
OK, so Natasha’s dress isn’t quite that bad. Unless there’s some industrial strength tit tape holding up the bodice, though, we suspect there’s a wardrobe malfunction in her very near future.
Now, we know what you’re going to say: “Oh, but some dresses/tops don’t look see-through until the camera flash hits them!” And yes, that’s true. But:
a) This doesn’t look like one of those tops
b) You’d think Kate Moss would know about the whole “flash makes some fabrics see-through” thing by now, wouldn’t you? She’s been in the business long enough, after all. Don’t they teach that kind of thing at Celebrity School?
In conclusion: we’re letting her off with a Wardrobe Malfunction ticket, but we’re not totally convinced this isn’t a full-blown crime of fashion. What do you think?
Let this be a lesson to us all, folks: if your dress has sheer sections on it at all – AT ALL – then going commando is not an option. We repeat: IS NOT AN OPTION.
Unfortunately, it looks like Geri Halliwell missed that memo – and paid the price. One more photo after the jump, to show you how the dress should look…
As far as the wearing of see-through dresses goes, this is only a minor offense. Indeed, at first glance, you may not even notice the fact that Heidi Klum here is wearing what appears to be a see-through skirt with a pair of giant knickers underneath.
Once you do notice it, though, it becomes pretty much all you can see, doesn’t it?
On anyone else, a wardrobe malfunction that would leave you lying awake at night thinking, "Oh God, what was I thinking?" On Heidi Klum? Well, you decide…
We’re not sure who made these shoes (any ideas?), so we can’t tell you whether they actually came like this, or whether Joss Stone here just bought two pairs and decided to mix it up a little. It’s the kind of thing Joss just might do, but then again, it’s the kind of thing some shoe designers we could mention just might do too, so we’re going to hold off on labeling this one a “wardrobe malfunction”, for now, at least.
Wardrobe malunction or deliberate decision, though, what do you think of Joss’s look here? Does she look, as the Daily Mail commented, “like she got dressed in the dark”, or is she just working her own, quirky style, and somehow pulling it off? The tie-dye cardigan is certainly in keeping with Joss’s “hippy chick” style, and she’s gone for a harlequin-style t-shirt dress underneath, which kinda reminds us of the nightwear of the 80s, although not necessarily in a bad way.
What’s the verdict, Fashion Police jurors? You like?
Oh great, this is just what we needed to see on a Friday afternoon – a dress that makes the eye go straight to the crotch, without passing ‘Go’ or, indeed, collection $200. Congratulations, Phoebe Price – your work here is done now. You have finally found the dress that allows you to have wardrobe malfunctions all day long, without having to wait around for a convenient gust of wind. We’re pretty sure you achieved this by going out wearing just a top, too. Let’s just hope you took your mother’s advice and wore some clean knickers. Or any knickers….
This is fact becoming one of our biggest fashion pet peeves of the moment. It’s the "Whoops, my boobs could just pop right out of this dress any second!" look, and it involves wearing super low-cut dresses or tops in flimsy fabrics, and then letting your breasts just flop right out of them. No, it’s nothing new, but there’s been a bit of a spate of it recently, and seriously, what’s up with that?
Now, we have nothing against breasts per se, and we’re not for one second suggesting that everyone should get all Victorian on us and go around buttoned up to the neck, but even assuming that Rachael Ray is, indeed, wearing tit tape to keep this dress on and prevent any wardrobe malfunctions, it’s still just a little too anatomical for us, and we just couldn’t feel comfortable letting it all hang out, so to speak. Could you?
We’re not sure who made these shoes (any ideas?), so we can’t tell you whether they actually came like this, or whether Joss Stone here just bought two pairs and decided to mix it up a little. It’s the kind of thing Joss just might do, but then again, it’s the kind of thing some shoe designers we could mention just might do too, so we’re going to hold off on labeling this one a “wardrobe malfunction”, for now, at least.
