You know what puzzles us most about this case, readers? The fact that, at $70, the Bakers shoes are:
a) Not exactly “cheap”.
b) Only $10 less than the sale price of the Betsey Johnson originals.
We’re assuming there are enough points of difference for Bakers not to get in trouble over this, but there aren’t enough for it not to be blatantly obvious what they’re up to, hmm?