Say No to Sacks Part 2: The jumpsuit sack

Sack-jumpsuit

  The Fashion Police's Say No to Sacks Campaign continues… We've  already said an emphatic "No!" to sack-like dresses, but this week we just want to say something that should really be self-evident, but apparently isn't, if the picture above is anything to go by. It's this:

If your sack has legs, that still doesn't make it OK.

We repeat: sacks with legs -or "jumpsuit sacks" = NOT OK. The Fashion Police will still come after you – especially if the sack in question costs $288, because that's just daylight robbery.

We hope this clarifies matters on the "sack" front. Oh, and if you're wondering why the model in the picture above doesn't have a head, don't worry: it's because she's part of our Victim Protection Plan. She didn't deserve to have this done to her, poor girl…

8 Comments

  • March 5, 2009

    Noelia

    Well, I work at home and I have to say that when I first saw this… this, I thought “Hey! It looks really comfy!” For being at home. But that’s it. I mean, I wouldn’t go outside with that on and I wouldn’t spend $288 on it. And I can’t belive someone would.

    View Comment
  • March 5, 2009

    Evelyn

    Reminds me of something I wore when I was pregnant. I loved it then because it fit perfectly…after all, I really DIDN’T have a waist!
    Otherwise, throw it in the brig!

    View Comment
  • March 5, 2009

    Rock Hyrax

    I now have “Come on Eileen” by Dexy’s Midnight Runners going round my head.

    View Comment
  • March 5, 2009

    gokarm

    I know a lot of young girls who would LOVE this. It’s got that asian slouchy-ness that is actually quite popular now. Throw on a grampa cardigan, some crazy oxfords and coke-bottle glasses and you’ve got one SERIOUS hipster look. oh, and um…some kinda shirt.

    View Comment
  • March 5, 2009

    Alexandrine

    I’d love my best enemy to wear it so I could laugh at her for years

    View Comment
  • March 5, 2009

    Bubbles

    LOL! I thought of Come on Eileen, too, the minute I saw it. Except no shirt underneath.

    View Comment
  • March 6, 2009

    chocoholic

    I would wear it.
    If I was painting a house.
    And being paid obscene amounts of money to do so.

    View Comment
  • March 9, 2009

    cangel

    can’t designers make up their minds. It is either too little or too much this year. Fashions appear to be either so skimpy that only a model can – or would dare – to wear them. Or they look like something a child might wear at the playground. Whatever happened to real fashion?

    View Comment