Marios net top with attached leggings: the ultimate in stuck-togther-clothes

King of the Stuck-Together-Clothes

King of the Stuck-Together-Clothes

Alarming news has reached us this afternoon, readers: it would seem that the stuck-together-clothes of the world have found themselves a KING.

Yes, leggings have gone and gotten themselves attached to a top. And, technically, this should just create some kind of unitard: bad, maybe, but not the worst thing we’ve seen here. Somehow, though, this garment manages to be much more bizarre than a mere unitard, because by “net top” they mean “short-sleeved net cardigan” and by “leggings” they mean “fishnet knee-highs”:

Fun with stuck-together-clothes

Fun with stuck-together-clothes

This is the reason The Fashion Police developed our rule on stuck-together-clothes in the first place. This is what happens when these things get out of hand, you see: you start off with a simple cardigan-stuck-to-shirt crime, and before you know what hit you, you’re walking around being all zany and keerrrraazzeee with your socks attached to your cardigan.

We don’t know what’s most surprising, either: the fact that this exists at all, or the fact that it’s sold out.

16 Comments

  • December 3, 2009

    marie

    I kind of like it ^^

    View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    Kaspian

    I’m pretty sure the shades the model’s wearing were not part of the outfit. She probably insisted on wearing them to hide her identity so nobody would recognise her modelling this atrocity… 🙂

    View Comment
    • December 3, 2009

      Rock Hyrax

      That’s what I was thinking. That and the fact that surely the back of your neck would start to ache once you’d attempted to wear the thing for a while.

      View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    Nyka

    Might be useful if you ever decide that your legs could perhaps fall off and when they do you want to be ready.

    View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    Kelly

    I’m with Marie. Somehow, I ended up liking it. Please kill me.
    .-= Kelly´s last blog ..Procurando Jairo desesperadamente =-.

    View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    rose

    Just reminds me too much of rubber bands for me to like it.

    View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    naomi

    at first i thought i liked it…the model seems to be enjoying it despite her identity obscuring shades…i thought “ooo funky kinda futuristic”…but then i realized how idiotic the garment would be with pants which ruined the whole vibe for me
    also i think intergalactic overlord > king of stuck-together-clothes…but i understand you may be reserving that moniker for an as yet unseen stuck-together monstrosity

    View Comment
  • December 3, 2009

    deka

    why would anyone want this??
    .-= deka´s last blog ..hello, my name is… =-.

    View Comment
  • December 4, 2009

    Melanthios

    Oh. My. Gawd.

    View Comment
  • December 4, 2009

    Melanie

    I truly hate gimmicky clothing.

    It’s like the designer is trying so hard to create something original that they fail to see that it hasn’t been done before for a very good reason.

    View Comment
  • December 4, 2009

    Diandra

    I kind of like this, (it’s not horrific and it’s still flattering!) but it would be so awkward to wear!

    View Comment
  • December 4, 2009

    k

    One picture, just one picture of her standing normally… then we’ll talk

    View Comment
  • December 4, 2009

    EricB

    Can it get any weirder than this? Knee-high leggins that are also a scarf –
    Is this fashion for contortionists?
    The shades are cool though. And it’s impressive that the model can present her legwear with such dignity.

    View Comment
  • December 5, 2009

    lizvocal

    We are not men. We are Devo.

    View Comment
  • December 6, 2009

    AJ

    What is this for?

    Never mind, I don’t want to know.

    View Comment
  • December 7, 2009

    zeezee

    I love it. Absolutely useless, but it’s got humour.

    View Comment