Marc Jacobs guilty of stuck-together shoe crimes yet again

marc-jacobs-shoe-bootsOh, Marc. Marc, Marc, Marc. Look, if you absolutely MUST stick shoes to boots, in a devlish bid to convince us that the wearer is, in fact, wearing a pair of black court shoes (and we’re not saying you SHOULD, by the way), you could at least make the boot part have the same approximate shape as a leg. Because these don’t look like shoes and tights/socks -they look like shoes and SACKS. Sacks, Marc. Who wants to wear sacks on their legs? WHO?

Is it you, readers? Do you want to wear sacks, but be able to say they’re “boots”? If so click here, and have £258 at the ready.

Marc Jacobs boots, £258

6 Comments

  • November 16, 2009

    EricB

    This is not pretty. Not even for shoe fetishists. How can a designer think his customers will get to shine in these shoes, erm, boots?

    View Comment
  • November 16, 2009

    Aleutie

    Now this looks really ugly.

    View Comment
  • November 16, 2009

    naomi

    looks like what would happen if you wore the bags you’re meant to carry the dress shoes in so that they won’t take up all that extra space in your handbag…

    View Comment
  • November 16, 2009

    Rock Hyrax

    If they weren’t “designer”, would a single pair sell? Even for a 10th of the price?

    View Comment
  • November 16, 2009

    AJ

    It makes you wonder what scares them, since the stuff that’s normal for them is already the stuff of nightmares.

    View Comment
  • November 18, 2009

    CoutureCoco

    I’m sorry this proves once and fo all he has lost the fashion plot. Shame.
    .-= CoutureCoco´s last blog ..Ivanka Trump =-.

    View Comment