Now, is it just us…
(WARNING: image NSFW, click at your own risk!)
Not Safe For Eyes 
| Tweet | 7 |
Category Archives: Lingerie
Not Safe For Eyes
Fashion Police for the Boys: The Kilt Thong
| Tweet |
Extreme sheer: YSL stretch-chiffon halterneck bodysuit
We’re a-hoping and a-praying that this bodysuit will only ever be used for purpose: as an underpinning for a backless halterneck dress. But that little shred of doubt loiters in the back of our minds, knowing, as we do, that the Lady Gagas of this world have so little respect for fit-for-purpose fashion…
Yves Saint Laurent certainly know how to relieve a fashionista of her hard-earned cash: this beauty will provide very little support a no coverage to speak of for the bargain price of £520.
You’d have to wear your backless halterneck an awful lot this summer to justify that cost per spend!
But yours from Net-a-Porter.
| Tweet |
Daylight Robbery? Starstyling holograph leggings
Is everyone else seeing a pair of fishnet tights with a few sequins stuck to them? Good, so are we. Topshop however, see £145 of leggings. That’s right folks, £145! And they’re calling them “leggings”. Now repeat after us: leggings are not pants. Fishnet anything are not leggings.
But wait! It gets worse! Continue reading
| Tweet |
Style On Trial: Swimwear that looks like underwear
So you’re languishing on the beach, and a girl walks past in her underwear. Only she’s not in her underwear, she’s wearing a bikini by Norma Kamali that looks like underwear, but isn’t.
We like the overall style of the bikini – the shape is so lovely and retro and we’d wear this as underwear in a flash. Or as swimwear were it a solid fabric. We’re just not sure we can get on board with the lace swimwear.
What do you think of this concept (there’s a one piece costume available too)? Would you wear swimwear that looks like you accidentally wore your lacy undies to the pool? Or do you prefer your swimwear to look more like, well, swimwear?
You can buy the briefs (£95) and top (£200) from Net-a-Porter.
| Tweet |
Denim lingerie? Er, yes please!
Here at The Fashion Police, we’ve always been of the opinion that denim is best kept for jeans only: and, OK, maybe the odd jacket or two, if we’re feeling in a Blossom kinda mood.
We’ve also always been kinda fickle, though, and this month we’re surprised to admit that Topshop have managed to turn us around on the issue of denim lingerie, although admittedly they’re at an advantage here, because we believe this to be more denim coloured, rather than the kind of fabric your jeans are made of.
Still, we’re not sure if it’s the polka dots, or the ruffles, or if we’ve maybe just been denim-lingerie-lovers all along, but this little set triggered our “cute” reflex. If it did the same for you, just click here to buy it…
| Tweet |
Fashion Police for the Boys: Underwear Edition (NSFW)
Something disturbing this way lies,
It’s not safe for work, and it’s not safe for eyes…
(Click at your peril…)
| Tweet |
Christie’s $959 lingerie set: worth it?
Well, it sure is pretty… but is it $959 worth of “pretty”? We’ll let you be the judge of that one: while The Fashion Police are partial to the odd piece of extravagant underwear, the fact that it’s hidden underneath our clothes (or quickly discarded, in the case of the “strictly-for-the-bedroom” stuff) makes us reluctant to pay more than the monthly mortgage repayment for it, which means we’re clearly not part of the target audience for this one.
This set is by Christies, and the bra is covered in Swarovski crystals (hence the high price), while the matching g-string also has Swarovski details. If you want to wear them, we’re afraid you’ll have to wait until November 22nd to do it, but you can pre-order now at Louisa Via Roma: click here to do it!
What do you think?
| Tweet |
