Leggings as Pants: Now worn *without* pants

leggings as pants

We’ve been saying for a long time now that leggings are not pants, nor should they be worn as pants.

We have a horrible feeling we’re fighting a losing battle with this one, though, because not only are these leggings being worn AS pants, they’re also being worn WITHOUT pants. Underpants, that is. Because there’s just no way you’d be able to avoid a VPL in these, is there?

sheer leggings

This just CANNOT be comfortable, can it? Wouldn’t you just feel so exposed, knowing that ¬†you were just a few short centimetres away from a citation for indecency from the real-life police? All we can say is that if you’re buying these, please think carefully about the fit. Too small will create a definite camel-toe. Too large, and we’ll all be able to SEE the cause of the camel toe. Don’t say we didn’t warn you…

[Product Page]


  • October 16, 2012

    Carolina W

    The real problem is, I see plenty of girls every day who would probably wear these, which is just sad.

    View Comment
  • October 17, 2012


    Very unhygienic…

    View Comment
  • October 19, 2012


    The last part of this post made me laugh so much, I spit out my drink…keep up the good work.

    If the girls are not wearing underwear to avoid the panty line when wearing leggings as pants, it would make more sense to just wear pants then.

    It also makes sense to wear underwear because that way you can just wash the underwear instead of the whole garment o.o

    View Comment
  • November 12, 2012


    We finally found something to wear the G string with.

    View Comment