Krysten Ritter keeps it simple in black

Kathyrn Ritter attends the 2nd Annual Bent on Learning Benefit

If we knew how to wolf-whistle, we’d totally be whistling at Krysten Ritter right now.

When your dress is this simple, a lot of people would be tempted to go heavy on the accessories, or add a dash of colour with the shoes or handbag, but Krysten stuck to black, without a single adornment in sight. It’s a striking look, but do you want to take her and accessorize her? Or do you think this works perfectly well just the way it is?

Also: great shoes!

Kathyrn Ritter attends the 2nd Annual Bent on Learning Benefit

4 Comments

  • April 29, 2010

    Alex

    I like it, the shoes don’t look like they quite fit right but are very pretty. (btw, I think her name is Krysten not Kathyrn.)
    .-= Alex´s last blog ..Fashionably Late to the Shoeper Shoe Challenge =-.

    View Comment
  • April 29, 2010

    Rock Hyrax

    I like it – better to look simple and chic than a Christmas tree.

    View Comment
  • May 4, 2010

    Eva

    Nah – it’s boring! I would love to see some more colour! And sparkle! Sparkle is great! 🙂
    .-= Eva´s last blog ..Coco Rocha at Met Costume Institute Gala 2010 =-.

    View Comment
  • June 9, 2010

    Nyka

    i’m a BIG fan of simple but some nail polish and a stone cocktail ring would have gone well. Don’t really like the bag. Love the shoes.

    View Comment