Kim Kardashian and her Louis Vuitton handbag

Kim_kardashian_louis_vuitto

The Fashion Police believe that while Kim Kardashian  herself is looking mighty fine in this picture,her Louis Vuitton sheepskin handbag may just be one of the fugliest LV bags we’ve ever seen.

Discuss.

8 Comments

  • March 20, 2008

    Veronika

    I agree. SHE looks good, actually way WAY better than usual..but the bag?! Uggh, horrible!

    View Comment
  • March 20, 2008

    Megan

    I also agree. She looks really good, in a non-skank way, for once, but the bag is vile. I wonder if she’s wearing matching boots 😀 Or if she’s carrying it to cover her massive ass. I mean, in that case, it’s totally doing the trick, right?

    View Comment
  • March 20, 2008

    Danielle

    For once, she is clean enough for a normal picture! The bag, though, is hideous.

    View Comment
  • March 20, 2008

    Veronika

    hahahaha I was also thinkin the same thing as Megan, wonderin if she’s coverin up her bum.. still, there’s much prettier bags that could do the trick..

    View Comment
  • March 20, 2008

    Juli

    Megan, that comment was totally overstepping the line. Don’t make fun of people with different body shapes! Alright, maybe her derriere is bigger than what we normally see on waif-like hollywood women, but does that mean a comment like that is justified? Please, just think before you say something like that.

    View Comment
  • January 7, 2009

    Hotti

    I love the bag! Its unique and sexy..

    View Comment
  • May 19, 2009

    HoneyRepublic

    Wow,I love louis Vuitton.But that bag is just horrible.I have seen it with her,Lala and Ciara.No,no,no.

    View Comment
  • April 11, 2012

    sikhulule ngxongwana

    hawuuuuuuu kimmy wat a bore for a bag no offense to LV.

    View Comment