Keira Knightley gets a new haircut, still flashes her boobs at every opportunity

Keiraknightley

Keira, we love your makeup and hair, here. Even although you’ve gone the Katie Holmes/Chritina Ricci "fringe" route, we think it works for you, and you’re looking as pretty as ever. But the thing is Keira – and we hesitate to bring this up again, when we had words with you about it just yesterday – but why do you persist in wearing outfits which use just a flimsy scarp of material over the nipples, leaving the rest of your torso bare like this? And what will it take to stop you?

5 Comments

  • December 7, 2007

    Beth

    This dress makes me sad, and not only in an “omg, why can I not afford such things?” kind of way. But because if there was just a leeetle bit more material, it would be a stunner. Even if the boob-connecting strip was a little lower. Hell, if that bit wasn’t there it would probably help. I’m just not down with the gaping chasm in the middle of the dress thing. For the record, though, I think Kiera’s shape is perfect for this – someone with bigger boobs would look slutty rather than demure.

    View Comment
  • December 7, 2007

    The Fashion Police

    Beth, I totally agree – and yes, on someone with bigger boobs, it wouldn’t bear thinking about!

    View Comment
  • December 8, 2007

    Haley

    I think she has exactly the wrong shape for this dress. I agree that its better for someone with smaller boobs (honestly, aren’t most dresses?), the problem area here is really her shoulders and the vast plain between her boobs. Seriously, her shoulders are huge.

    View Comment
  • December 8, 2007

    mika

    omg that flimsy strip covering her boobs is nothing compared to her back. you have to see it! i think she’s going for the pixie fairy look

    View Comment
  • December 9, 2007

    lili

    What about the shoes….? Let alone the fact that they don’t match the outfit, they’re hideous.

    View Comment