Henry Holland’s unique solution to the see-through dress

We’ve actually shown you this House of Holland dress before, on the catwalk last year, but it was one of those things we looked at and thought, “Yeah, what happens on the runway stays on the runway – there’s just no way that’ll actually go into production.”

Just goes to show what WE know, eh?

This is now available to buy at Colette, where it will set you back $644 / £418. We’d like to think that those who DO decide to buy it will at least wear something underneath it, to stop it looking quite so much like a chopped-up shress, but of course, there’s a big difference between what we’d LIKE to happen and what actually DOES happen in the world of fashion, so feel free to place your bets on which celebrity will be the first to wear it exactly as it is…

8 Comments

  • February 25, 2010

    Anna-Lisa

    Aygness Deyn. But that’s too obvious.
    .-= Anna-Lisa´s last blog ..New York fashion week inspiration: Jen Kao =-.

    View Comment
  • February 25, 2010

    Aleutie

    Well, I would like to see it on Johnny Depp, but not with my luck.

    View Comment
  • February 25, 2010

    Janelle

    Amber Rose
    .-= Janelle´s last blog ..What I’m attracted to =-.

    View Comment
  • February 25, 2010

    Bonnie

    is anyone else concerned about the back?! Booty is nearly as frightening as boobs.

    View Comment
  • February 25, 2010

    lori

    Anna-Lisa beat me to it, so I’m going to go with M.I.A., who happened to wear the same heinous dress as Aygness that was along the same lines as this. You remember, the black shress with some black opaque circles and white polka dots.

    View Comment
  • February 26, 2010

    talley

    I was thinking Amber Rose, but I think I’m going to say Lindsey Lohan.
    .-= talley´s last blog ..Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell =-.

    View Comment
  • February 26, 2010

    Rock Hyrax

  • April 3, 2010

    Anastaciya

    U G L Y that dress ain’t got no alibi, it’s ugly!

    View Comment