Gwyneth Paltrow flashes her knickers in Antonio Berardi

Spl59751_0131

Now THAT’S what we call a "visible panty line!" And a visible bra line, too, come to think of it…

The Fashion Police have been fairly tolerant of Gwyneth Paltrow’s recent adventures in fashion, mostly because we loved the shoes, and she looked like she was thoroughly enjoying herself, but when she showed up to the Two Lovers Paris premiere this week in see-through Antonio Berardi, we think she was possibly enjoying herself just a little bit too much, no? (We’d also call foul on the Rupert Sanderson boots here because, although we love them, they look like they’re being worn with white ankle socks in this instance. But that’s the least of our concerns with this outfit…)

This is exactly how Berardi sent this dress down the runway (with white undies underneath) so we don’t think this was a mistake on Gwyneth/her stylist’s part either – and in any case, it would be pretty hard not to notice that your white knickers were highly visible under your sheer dress, wouldn’t it? No, we think she meant it, and while we appreciate the recent attempts at "edginess" on Gwynnie’s part recently, we think it needs to stop here, before she starts veering off into "Agyness Deyn" territory. What about you?

7 Comments

  • November 6, 2008

    Sarah

    I think the dress would be ugly even if her undies weren’t showing.
    Bad show, Gwyneth.
    Throw the book at her, fashion police.

    View Comment
  • November 6, 2008

    bootsie

    Drugs HAVE to be involved in this crime fiasco! Book her. NOW.

    View Comment
  • November 6, 2008

    peachfish

    It looks like a deconstructed girdle was glued to the front of the dress.

    View Comment
  • November 6, 2008

    Amanda Nicole

    She should stick to the uber-short cocktail dresses as far as her new edgy look goes. And you’re right, the shoes here are doing nothing to salvage her outfit.

    View Comment
  • November 7, 2008

    Amy

    Oh this is AWFUL. Beyond awful.

    View Comment
  • November 7, 2008

    Lauren

    UGGGH!
    My newspaper described this is “stunning”
    Personally I would describe this as evening wear for a prostitute.

    View Comment
  • November 7, 2008

    Lauren

    UGGGH!
    My newspaper described this is “stunning”
    Personally I would describe this as evening wear for a prostitute.

    View Comment