Daylight Robbery? Starstyling holograph leggings

Starstyling holograph leggingsIs everyone else seeing a pair of fishnet tights with a few sequins stuck to them?  Good, so are we.  Topshop however, see £145 of leggings.  That’s right folks, £145!  And they’re calling them “leggings”.  Now repeat after us: leggings are not pants.  Fishnet anything are not leggings.

But wait!  It gets worse!

There’s a matching top!

Starstyling holograph topWe have no words.

The top is £160, also from Topshop.

7 Comments

  • March 29, 2011

    Daisy

    Clothes like that must be a sign of an oncoming apocalyps…

    View Comment
  • March 29, 2011

    andrew

    I almost laughed when I saw the matching top, that’s crazy haha. the leggings look like some whack running tights that I’d practice in at the university just to upset my head coach hahaha

    View Comment
  • March 29, 2011

    Rudi

    I seem to be saying this a lot but sci fi much? This is just a step away from a full figure-hugging jumpsuit, and shiny to boot!

    View Comment
  • March 30, 2011

    Janeth

    EWW that is just wrong

    View Comment
  • March 30, 2011

    Minka

    I just can’t imagine a situation where this could look appropriate. Also, sane.

    View Comment
  • April 7, 2011

    louis

    thanks for the free publicity! just to answer to the question of who would wear this:
    we just sold a net piece to kate moss. i think she has some fashion credibility, don’t you?

    best wishes from berlin, the place where creative people live and still think freely

    xxxx
    starstyling

    View Comment
  • April 15, 2011

    Jessy

    How can someone ever wear these? Or even worse, how can someone think of them, design them, sell them? God, this is soo wrong

    View Comment