Chloe’s three-quarter length sheer pants: the worst case of VPL we’ve seen this year

Chloe-sheer-pants

On the plus side, at least this model is actually wearing underwear. On the minus side, though… we can see it. Clearly. And we don't know about you, but there's not many people whose underwear is of a huge amount of interest to us, especially not when we're out in public.

Yes, folks, just when you thought it was safe to go back to Yoox.com, the shants are back, and they're just as confusing as ever. These ones are by Chloe, and going by the design, they don't really look like they're supposed to be worn underneath something else, but we're really hoping they're not supposed to be worn like this either, because as we're sure you're all aware, not all butt cheeks are created equal, and there aren't many we'd fancy coming face to, er, cheek with as we go about our daily business.

If you'd like to show the world your wares, though, these will cost you £190, and you can buy them here.

9 Comments

  • July 6, 2009

    gokarm

    good lord, will this NEVER pass? I don’t take the sheer clothing thing very seriously and rarely comment on it because I so highly doubt it will ever become an everyday thing, but CHLOE?!? I mean, these high end designers make a living on having good taste. These pants should come with a footnote explaining just wtf they’re THINKING with these shants. I SHANT be buying!

    View Comment
  • July 6, 2009

    Bubbles

    These are horrific.

    View Comment
  • July 6, 2009

    Zan

    In this economy I can barely justify buying new pants, let alone see-through ones for that astronomical price. Big sigh!

    View Comment
  • July 7, 2009

    spikesnsilk

    Dear heavens, this is verging on the obscene. And I don’t mean modesty-wise, though that could be included.

    View Comment
  • July 9, 2009

    Selina

    Wait! What? Why?
    Is it April 1st?

    View Comment
  • July 9, 2009

    Selina

    Wait! What? Why?
    Is it April 1st?

    View Comment
  • July 11, 2009

    Melanie

    I don’t care if it says Chloe on the label. They look cheap, nasty and I’d turn my nose up at them if they were in New Look.
    Is it just me or does it seem the greats fallen recently???

    View Comment
  • March 8, 2010

    HalfMoonMan

    Just what is it with women and VPL? Why do women want it to look like they are tramps and they wear no underwear? The thought of a woman in tight pants or a short skirt with no panties underneath is abhorrent to me. Who ever said VPL letting us know you are NOT going commando is a bad thing? Other women, thats all. I’ll let you in on a little secret….8 out of 10 men LOVE seeing VPL. Why do women want it to look like they are tramps and wear no underwear?
    These pants look GREAT!!!!!!

    View Comment
    • March 8, 2010

      The Fashion Police

      I’l let you in on a little secret too: 8 out of 10 women don’t care what men think, and feel patronised by them telling us what we would wear in order to please them. We’ll wear whatever we like, thanks.

      View Comment