Breaking (almost) every rule in the style book…

 

crimes-of-fashion

GULP.

Where to start with this one? Where to start? Any one of these items (except maybe the shoes) would’ve been bad enough on its own, but to cram all of them together on the same model like this: well, it just seems like a flagrant attempt to get her arrested, doesn’t it?

So far, we count four separate crimes and misdemeanours:

1. Visible bra

2. See-through top

3. Shoulder pads. Visible ones.

4. Leggings worn as pants.

Even this list, though, doesn’t really capture the magnitude of FUG that is this outfit. What were you thinking, MyCatwalk? WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

16 Comments

  • November 26, 2009

    Rock Hyrax

    I think the Writing Division also need to be involved – for the almost vomit-inducingly pretentious description that includes (1) use of the word ‘voilà’ in a non-ironic context and (2) mis-spelling it as a musical instrument. Mind you I suppose (2) negates (1)…

    View Comment
  • November 26, 2009

    naomi

    if the ellery woman is strong, bold and fearless and believes “more is more” as the ad states…methinks she would have no problem demanding MORE fabric be present before she shells out MORE than $300 for a top lol

    View Comment
  • November 26, 2009

    Selina

    Whaaaa? This makes my poor brain hurt so much that I cannot find anything else to say. Whaaa?
    .-= Selina´s last blog ..A year’s worth of shoes? Count me in! =-.

    View Comment
  • November 27, 2009

    k

    5. Spotted pants/top that look like a contagious disease

    View Comment
  • November 27, 2009

    EricB

    It’s a playsuit for a lazy Saturday when the whole apartment becomes your bed.
    That’s an occasion when the Fashion Police is being locked out.

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    AJ

    6. See through pants.
    7. Visible panties.

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    Romanticide

    Did this designed made this outfit only for you to judge it? No really, it’s just the perfect combination to call the attention of the fashion police and get arrested…
    .-= Romanticide´s last blog ..Lo último en pura prosa que leí (por gusto) fue: =-.

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    Diandra

    Yuck, it doesn’t even attempt to match! I think the visible bra is definitely the worst. The orthopedic-esque sandals are a close second to me.
    (Or, maybe they’re just poor, innocent, normal looking sandals that got caught up in the ugliness of this outfit? Who knows)

    View Comment
    • November 28, 2009

      The Fashion Police

      I suspect the sandals are innocent, here – not the prettiest shoes in the world, granted, but just caught up in the general fug!

      View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    kevie

    I could almost dismiss it as a routine “underwear as outerwear” violation, if not for the shoulder pads. On the outside. Kym Ellery is laughing at the “Ellery woman” until she wets herself.

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    Lilly

    GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    Lyddiegal

    The shoulder pads and the leggings frighten me the most. and I wonder, who thought this was a good idea??
    .-= Lyddiegal´s last blog ..Where can I find these damask print tights? =-.

    View Comment
  • November 28, 2009

    Ash

    If more is more I’d rather have nothing.

    View Comment
  • November 30, 2009

    zeezee

    Well. I like the studded leggings. And that’s it.

    As a side-note: the “older posts” link at the bottom of every page has gone kabloo-ey for me. Known problem or my computer being weird?

    View Comment