Arrested: Mark Fast Mini Dress with Cut-out Detail

stripper-dress

Goodness, but streetwalking must be paying well these days when even the cheapest-looking hookers can afford to pay £595 / $978  for their dresses!

Seriously, almost $1000 for something that even Great Glam would dismiss as a little too trashy? Has the fashion world gone mad?

Oh. Stupid question, huh?

Mark Fast mini dress with cutout detail, £395, Browns

9 Comments

  • September 21, 2009

    Rock Hyrax

    At least at that price not many people will be wearing it.

    View Comment
  • September 21, 2009

    JJ

    I blame it on all those herve Leger dresses

    View Comment
  • September 21, 2009

    charles

    breast implants sold seperately? wow great glam is just awful =(
    .-= charles´s last blog ..Major Fall Outfit Dress Up Sess. =-.

    View Comment
  • September 22, 2009

    Andara

    Oh, and please don’t miss the fact that since it’s a knit/mesh design, you can see right through it at every point that stretches!

    I can’t see this being appropriate anywhere other than the beach.

    ^-.-^

    View Comment
  • September 22, 2009

    shelbysunshine

    Looking at the pictures makes me wanna stitch some fabric on it to patch up the holes..
    .-= shelbysunshine´s last blog ..Shelby has her tablet back… =-.

    View Comment
  • September 23, 2009

    annet

    i wouldn’t exactly call that a cut-out DETAIL.
    .-= annet´s last blog ..portrait =-.

    View Comment
  • September 23, 2009

    lori

    I think the design of the back would be great on an evening gown, but it’s too short, too see-through, too slutty in the front, and too… knit to work as is.

    View Comment
  • February 14, 2010

    Andre Yasu

    Just so you know, There was f**king hours of knitting in that dress. Thats why its so expensive.

    View Comment
  • October 28, 2010

    Erin

    @Andre Yasu
    If it took that long to knit it why did they miss so many parts, Also they must have saved a sh*t load on fabric, theres barely any there!

    View Comment