Er, excuse us love, you seem to have forgotten your trousers… Whoops, no, our mistake! It’s a dress, isn’t it? Oh God, it’s a dress, and it’s exactly the kind of dress The Fashion Police hate, with enough volume up top to hide several people under and then… nothing. It only just skims the crotch, making it look like the slightest movement will leave you vulnerable to a wardrobe malfunction of the "knicker flashing" variety.
That’s how it looks on this model, anyway, and OK, granted, she’s probably a little taller than average. Maybe it would look better on a shorter person. Or with leggings. Or… actually, no, we give in: we wouldn’t be able to resist the temptation to put a belt around it to give it at least SOME shape, and that would just look silly, and make it even shorter than it is already, so we’re just going to stick to our original impression, which was that this is decidedly not for us.
Is it for you, though? We’ve spoken of our total aversion to "tent dresses" before, so we have a clear bias against this kind of style, and are probably therefore not the best people to stand in judgment of it. What do you think of it?
(If you like it, you can buy it here.)