Worse than harem pants?

ugly trousers

There's just nothing right about this picture, is there? We could stare at it all day, in fact, and we still probably wouldn't find even one thing to like.

Not the baggy crotch.

Not the uncomfortably-thick looking wool flannel.

Not the excessive number of pockets (seriously, who NEEDS that amount of pockets), including that strange little one over the groin area.

Not the £253 price tag.

Nothing.

Can you see any redeeming features in these? Would you wear them?

[Buy them]


  • 8 Comments  -   By Amber McNaught
  
NEXT PAGE » »

Tags: ,

8 comments on “Worse than harem pants?

    • lizvocal —
    • Reply ↓

    Might be useful for carrying all your worldly possessions in the winter after the apocalypse. Leave your hands free for your weapons. Before then, not so much, no.

      • Rock Hyrax —
      • Reply ↓

      Won’t last long tripping over those bootlaces though… ;-)

        • lizvocal —
        • Reply ↓

        If you do not know how to tie up your bootlaces, then natural selection takes over, and the zombie catch you. LOL

    • Heidi —
    • Reply ↓

    Might be comfy and “social protection” if you were the only woman in an Antarctic research station ….

  • I like the………. waistband? No, never mind, I don’t like the 2-button thing. So, nothing to like.

    • Janeth —
    • Reply ↓

    Yikes!
    I’ll have nightmares tonight about zombie harem pants

    • Who Cares? —
    • Reply ↓

    Hmmm… perfect for a war momma. Carry the four kids in the pockets on the sides and ammo in the wierd pockets on the crotch.
    Oh, god. What has our society come to?

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Optionally add an image (JPEG only)