Jeremy Scott re-invents the denim jacket

Jeremy Scott denim jacket

Oh, that Jeremy Scott! We bet you didn't even know the humble denim jacket needed a makeover, did you? Well, it did. And JS knew it. He's given this one an off-the-shoulder cut, with a large neck ruffle. The poor jacket will never be the same again.

Would you WANT it to, though? Do you think so-called "classics" (We know a lot of people hate jean jackets, but just as many others would consider them something of a wardrobe staple...) should just be left alone, or is this one a welcome breath of fresh air? Does THIS influence your decision at all?

Jeremy Scott denim jacket

How about the fact that it's $426?

Innocent or guilty, Fashion Jurors: what say you? 

[Click here for the product page]


  • 5 Comments  -   By Amber McNaught
  
NEXT PAGE » »

Tags: ,

5 comments on “Jeremy Scott re-invents the denim jacket

    • Virginia —
    • Reply ↓

    I wouldn’t really dislike it if I liked jean jackets in the first place…

    • Jeannine —
    • Reply ↓

    I don’t hate it, but I can’t imagine wearing it, or what anyone else would wear with it either. Maybe someone else has some idea?

  • I actually quite like it, not with jeans though. I have a couple of skirts…

    Then again my entire wardrobe probably adds up to less than this jacket. XD

    • naiadknight —
    • Reply ↓

    That poor, poor jacket. What’d it do to deserve abuse at the hands of Jeremy Scott?
    I’ll stick with my beat to hell, older than most 2nd graders, Levi’s jean jacket.

    • lizvocal —
    • Reply ↓

    I think the hair doozy on the model clearly shows this designer did not intend this to be a serious fashion statement. This is a joke.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Optionally add an image (JPEG only)