Harem Pants: Officially Still Ugly

ugly harem pants Harem Pants: Officially Still Ugly

Not that there was ever really any doubt about this, but just in case there was, we’d like to take this opportunity to confirm that yes, harem pants are still ugly. They didn’t get any better looking in the few weeks since we last wrote about them. More worrying still, ignoring them doesn’t seem to make them go away. We really thought it would, you know. We thought it would be one of those “trends” which wouldn’t actually exist outside the pages of the fashion magazines and the runways of a few select designers: that most people with eyes would be able to see that no good could ever come of adding a dropped crotch to a pair of pants, and harem pants would disappear from the world, never to be seen again. Or at least, never to be seen until some “edgy” designer decided to try to convince us all that we really DO want to look like we have completely square crotches.

This week, the label in question is Givenchy, who think it’s entirely plausible that people will want to pay $1725 to look like the unfortunate model featured above, who probably thanked her lucky stars that this job didn’t require her to show her face.

What we really want to know, though, is who is wearing all of these harem pants we keep finding ourselves having to arrest. Seriously, this has been going on for YEARS now, and yet we’ve still to see more than a few brave people actually “rocking” the trend in real life. And trust us, there was no actual “rocking” going on in those cases. And yet, if our research is to be believed, SOMEONE must be giving all of these designers reason to believe that their almost-$2000 harem pants will just fly off the shelves. Look!

sold out harem pants Harem Pants: Officially Still UglySold. Out. At that price. And looking like… that.

Who’s doing this? And how do we stop them?

(Click here if you desperately want to join them.)

Victoria Grant ‘Sex Shop’ hat: classy

sex shop hat Victoria Grant Sex Shop hat: classy

Lady Gaga is apparently a big fan of Victoria Grant.

Why are we not surprised?

(Click here if you want to buy it. Don’t be surprised to find that it will cost you $2,077 to walk around with a “Sex Shop” sign on your head.)

First sign of the apocalypse (Or Christian Dior Spring/Summer 2012 runway)

model in sheer dress First sign of the apocalypse (Or Christian Dior Spring/Summer 2012 runway)

It is written in the Fashion Police Testament: “When Dior’s models walk the runway without their knickers, the apocalypse shall surely follow.”

We hope you’re all ready for the end of the world, folks…

[Images: PRPhotos]

Designer Vs High Street: Stella McCartney Vs Mango

stella mccartney mango dress Designer Vs High Street: Stella McCartney Vs Mango

All rise for the case of Mango Vs McCartney!

Actually, it’s OK, you can sit back down: there’s really no case to be answered here – this is a straightforward case of “designer inspiration” as opposed to “blatant copying”, and while you can clearly see where the inspiration from this Mango dress has come from, there are enough differences between it and the Stella McCartney original to make it very obvious which is which.

Unfortunately for Mango, the side-by-side comparison doesn’t really do their creation any favours. We’re sure it probably looks nice on, but next to the Stella, it does look a little… well, cheap, really.

IS it cheap? Well, it’s £34.90, so we’d say yes, it is. As for the McCartney dress, you’ll pay £1285 for the privilege: ouch.