At first glance we thought this was just a skirt: but look closer. There is, in fact, a pair of shorts peeking out from under the front hemline.:
From the back it does indeed look like just a skirt, creating some sort of reverse mullet skirt which is surely a crime of fashion in itself? But these are the short version of those skirts-attached-to-trousers that were so popular in the late 1990s. And that can’t possibly be a good thing. Can it? Tell us below, and if you want to buy this item, it is $950 at Saks Fifth Avenue.
1. It’s shapeless and not flattering regardless of the skirt.
2. It’s way too expensive.
3. If those were cycling pants instead of bloomers I might even give the ensemble some approval for the general idea. The way it is now: No, thanks.
This looks like it belongs on the set of a 70′s sci-fi.