Is everyone else seeing a pair of fishnet tights with a few sequins stuck to them? Good, so are we. Topshop however, see £145 of leggings. That’s right folks, £145! And they’re calling them "leggings". Now repeat after us: leggings are not pants. Fishnet anything are not leggings.
But wait! It gets worse!
There’s a matching top!
We have no words.
The top is £160, also from Topshop.
7 comments on “Daylight Robbery? Starstyling holograph leggings”
Clothes like that must be a sign of an oncoming apocalyps…
I almost laughed when I saw the matching top, that’s crazy haha. the leggings look like some whack running tights that I’d practice in at the university just to upset my head coach hahaha
I seem to be saying this a lot but sci fi much? This is just a step away from a full figure-hugging jumpsuit, and shiny to boot!
EWW that is just wrong
I just can’t imagine a situation where this could look appropriate. Also, sane.
thanks for the free publicity! just to answer to the question of who would wear this:
we just sold a net piece to kate moss. i think she has some fashion credibility, don’t you?
best wishes from berlin, the place where creative people live and still think freely
xxxx
starstyling
How can someone ever wear these? Or even worse, how can someone think of them, design them, sell them? God, this is soo wrong