Amanda Seyfried wore head-to-toe Valentino to the Golden Globes after party. It’s a label that’s usually synonymous with style and sophistication, which begs the question: what the hell went wrong here? Why does the dress look like it’s been patched together in a hurry, using fabrics found on the cutting room floor? Why does the early promise of the bodice peter out into a disappointing mid-section and, frankly horrifying bottom half? Are those SHOES?
On the plus side: we love her hair. Maybe if we concentrate really hard on it, it’ll help us forget those shoes?
A vintage look for Rose McGowan, from the tulle on her bright blue dress, to her strappy silver sandals! We love this colour with her hair and skin, and so it gets our whole-hearted approval. What do you think?
From the waist up, it’s kinda like what your mother would wear to the Golden Globes. From the waist down, it’s… not. We can see what Ashley Tisdale was probably doing here: following a basic “if you’re going to wear a fringed mini skirt and leopard print shoes, wear something totally non-revealing on top.” It’s generally a sound rule to live by, but we feel a bit like her torso looks like it belongs on someone else here. What do you think?
Lindsay Lohan had found the perfect cure for bad hair days
After the party comes the after party, and after the Golden Globes came… Lindsay Lohan in this unusual hooded dress, which makes her look a bit like either:
b) Lindsay is the hooded spectre of doom, and her appearance here is some kind of warning to us all. We must re-check the Fashion Bible and find out if there’s a passage saying, “When the hooded spectre of Lindsay Lohan shalt appear at the Golden Globes, Crocs and harem pants shall be in fashion forever more!” or some such thing.
While we’re doing that, feel free to tell us what you think of Lindsay’s outfit here!
P.S – for more Golden Globes after party looks, visit our Celebrity Spy section!
This is what happens when you allow the skirts with windows we showed you last week to exist unchecked.
First there was Boutique’s maxi skirt, with a “window” from the knee down. It was ugly, but not indecent. We decided to let it live. Then there was Karl Lagerfeld’s mini skirt with window on the thighs. It, too, was ugly, and it also started to ring the alarm bells, because once you’ve allowed something like that to exist, you’ve just paved the way for … Topshop’s mesh seam skirt! Which is basically just all window, not so much skirt, isn’t it? Topshop obviously looked at the other two examples, thought, “We can do better than that!”, and this is what they came up with. It’s funnier when viewed from the back, but the front is exactly the same:
Of course, if this was meant to be an UNDERSKIRT, that would be a different matter altogether. That’s what we thought it was, at first, and we were OK with that. It’s not, though: it’s in the “skirts” section rather than the “lingerie” one, and, well, it’s the kind of thing Topshop do, isn’t it? How do you think they expect us to wear it, though? Presumably NOT as shown on the mannequin, but … HOW? Gwyneth Paltrow style, perhaps? We shudder to think. If you have a way to wear it, though:
How much would you give us for a pair of boots that look like this, readers?
How about $1,794? Does that sound good to you? No? But… but…they’re DESIGNER! We know they LOOK like someone just dug them out of the dumpster, but they are, in fact, brand, spanking new, and the product of a creative process so unique that they were deemed to be worth the best part of $2,000.
Either that or they’re made from unicorn skin.
We have to admit, though, if these boots were in front of us right now, we’d probably slip one of them on, and use it to kick ourselves hard for not coming up with this idea first. Seriously: imagine if you were able to convince people to spend $1,700 on a pair of old boots! Think of the money you could make from dumpster diving! Yes, if Augusta really are able to persuade people to part with that much money, for something that looks like this, then we feel we have to take our hats off to them. That’s the kind of persuasive power you really don’t want to mess with. We wonder if they’d be interested in joining the force?
Such is the way of the award ceremony, unfortunately, and we just don’t have the time to discuss every single one of the hits and misses of the 67th Annual Golden Globes, as much as we’d like to. That doesn’t mean you can’t discuss them, though: we’ve rounded up as many of last night’s looks as we were able to, so have a look at the gallery below, and remember to tell us whose outfits you loved and loathed!
Here comes the bride! Oops, no, our mistake, it’s just Kate Hudson: false alarm!
Actually, this dress makes us want to get married, just so we’d have a plausible excuse to wear it. (And something to catch the crumbs from the wedding cake in, too!) It’s by Marchesa, and is really a work of art, although whether it’s a good one or a bad one is, of course, up to you to decide. Kate wore it with a pair of chunky white platform shoes by Casadei. We wouldn’t imagine this would’ve been one of the most comfortable outfits of the evening, but was it worth it, do you think?
