Not particularly wild
There is a saying The Fashion Police have always found to be true. The saying is, “If you have to say it, you ain’t it”. You know all those people who go around telling you how “crazy” they are? Ever noticed how they always end up being some of the dullest people around? This is the proof of our little saying. By the same token, we’d be willing to bet that the kind of people who buy and wear these ‘Wild Child’ leggings by Wildfox, will probably be anything BUT “wild”. Instead, they’ll be the kind of people who commit crimes of fashion, you mark our words.
If you’d like to be one of them, though, these are $92 at Karmaloop.
you know what other saying would fit in that space? ugly pants…same amount of letters and everything…just sayin’…
Wow, even the font is ugly.
I wonder if the horrible looking crotch is designed to prevent people committing the “wearing leggings as trousers” crime…
Ha ha, I agree with the logic in this post, it’s just like celebrity couples who always brag about how much hot sex they have. (They probably almost never have sex.) These leggings are ridiculous and sort of sad, like “Look at me, I’m wild! Really! It says so on my pants!”
Everything is ugly in this legging, but…what the heck happened with her panty line?!
Kelly´s last blog ..Procurando Jairo desesperadamente
I have always said, anything that claims “A Touch of Class”, usually doesn’t have any class at all.
Yeah, also I’ve seen plenty of “Wilder” leggings…a true “Wild Child” would probably wear sequined, print, liquid, metallic or neon leggings… not plain white. The font isn’t very good either.
oh and 92 dollars??!! I can get a pair of cheap white leggings and write “Wild Child” on them, and they would be cuter and cheaper! LOL
Reminds of that trend from the early 2000s (words like Angel, Cutie, Lil Devil, written on the back of pants..) it looks just a little pathetic after age 14.