Our gut instinct: when a dress could be mistaken for a bottle of perfume from a distance, it’s probably a crime of fashion.
In the interests of giving it a fair trial, however, we put it you, ladies and gentlemen of the Fashion Police jury: IS this a crime of fashion? Or do you actually kinda like it? (If you do, it’s £785 at Browns.)
No liking it..too perfume bottle looking in print.
.-= SnapandPrint´s last blog ..Things I Love Round-Up. =-.
i’d have to see it on someone before i could judge.
I think I’d have to try it on to know for sure. The shape at the top looks a little odd.
Same as Erika. I need to see in someone before I could judge…
.-= Kelly´s last blog ..Ski utenfor Rio…yeah, you betcha! =-.
Most Couturiers make their money by selling perfumes anyway, not by selling clothes, so why shouldn’t they make clothes looking like perfumes? It’s just them being honest.
i dont get it….
You nailed it! I definitely thought it was a bottle of perfume!!!
I hate it. It’s just entirely too confusing to be a regular dress. Mabey it’s just a holiday dress or something.
I think I might almost like it…
It’s a dress? Seriously? Do not want.
.-= Selina´s last blog ..Your daily dose of pretty: Lulu Corselette =-.
It’s just….interesting looking.
not what i pictured at all from the description as a silk roll-neck dress….maybe the silk eau de 36-26-36 toilette would have been more accurate lol…although the cut of the top there might make it the 46-26-36 toilette dress…would love to see it on someone
I want to see it on a person before I make a call, on this one.
At first glance I liked the trompe l’oeil effect. Then I realised it was supposed to be a bottle. Ugh.
I rather like it, but I doubt I would actually wear it anywhere.
I like it too. It’s definately a stand-out piece, if nothing else.
It’s actually supposed to look like just that, a perfume bottle. Her AW09 collection was digital prints of perfume bottles reworked
I rather like some of the pieces but this is not one of them.