Midas Media ShoeperWoman Hey Dollface Forever Amber Keeping it Realtor Writing World Grumpy Bloggers Rubinman
graphics
graphic

November 30th, 2009

Shress Roundup: straight from the Sheer Dress section of the Fashion Police jail

Annarita Celano shress, £25

Annarita Celano shress, £225

Sheer dresses – or “shresses” as the fashion world dubbed them shortly after they started to appear on the runways. How we laughed at them! Soon, however, it was the SHRESSES that were having the last laugh, because rather than disspear almost immediately, as we felt sure they would, the shresses went forth and multipied, and pretty soon they were popping up all over the place. In fact, we had to inagurate a whole new wing of the Fashion Police jail for them, so we could keep them away from the other inmates. (Shresses are a bad influence on other clothes, you see. You don’t even want to KNOW what happened when one briefly shared a cell with harem pants…)

The one saving grace of the shress, of course, is that we still haven’t seen anyone wearing one in “real” life, and for that we will be forver grateful. That doesn’t mean we can’t still have a good ol’ laugh at them, though, so here, for your viewing pleasure (or displeasure, as the case may be) are some of the current crop of shresses occupying our jail…

All shresses: Yoox.com




7 Responses to “Shress Roundup: straight from the Sheer Dress section of the Fashion Police jail”

  1. naomi says:

    if i had known what i could charge for mom’s sheer drapes i would have converted them to shresses years ago lol

  2. Selina says:

    The Annarita Celano dress? Brothel curtains!
    Selina´s last blog ..Your daily dose of pretty: not for the arachnophobic

    My ComLuv Profile

  3. Bethany says:

    The bead danglies make it look like a shredded shress.

  4. lizvocal says:

    I bought the Comme des Garcons shress from Fredericks of Hollywood for $29. Not to wear out of the house, of course……

  5. Milly says:

    I don’t know…worn properly…perhaps rather as layering rather than the dress itself…the Alexander McQueen one could be rather nice. Perhaps.

  6. Madeline says:

    I guess that these should be worn like those 20’s overdresses, with some silk sheats underneath. But nobody seems to be making these anymore, so that option is out of the question…

  7. Diandra says:

    The one in the picture reminds me of those beaded doorway thingies I had when I was little lol!
    While I think visible underwear is extremely trashy, I don’t really hate shresses…Maybe they could be pretty with something pretty over/under them! (like the Alexander Mcqueen one!)

Leave a Reply

Fashion Police Comment Policy

> No personal attacks or abuse: criticize clothes, not people! (This includes derogatory comments about weight.)
> No self-promotion, i.e. spam
> Please keep your comments on-topic and email us directly with more general feedback/questions.
> Remember, The Fashion Police is a light-hearted site that is not intended to be taken too seriously, so any comments that break these rules will be removed.
> A fuller version of this comment policy can be found here


CommentLuv Enabled





 
graphic
 
 
graphicEdinburgh Web Design
graphicSubscribe
graphicFollow Us
graphicBecome a Fan
graphicContact
graphicPrivacy Policy