<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Megan Fox falls foul of &#8220;leggings are not pants&#8221; rule</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Carla</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25822</link> <dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:10:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25822</guid> <description>leggings work great as pants</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leggings work great as pants</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25630</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25630</guid> <description>They do, don&#039;t they? I think the weird colour is the main problem - it almost looks like skin, only skin that&#039;s really cold and/or bruised. I think if they&#039;d been black (or another dark colour) it would&#039;ve looked much better (although I still think leggings are best worn with something covering the crotch!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do, don&#8217;t they? I think the weird colour is the main problem &#8211; it almost looks like skin, only skin that&#8217;s really cold and/or bruised. I think if they&#8217;d been black (or another dark colour) it would&#8217;ve looked much better (although I still think leggings are best worn with something covering the crotch!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kevie</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25627</link> <dc:creator>kevie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25627</guid> <description>These look more like a bad body-stocking than leggings. Plus, it looks like half of her Wonder Bra is escaping her top.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These look more like a bad body-stocking than leggings. Plus, it looks like half of her Wonder Bra is escaping her top.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Melanthios</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25579</link> <dc:creator>Melanthios</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:19:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25579</guid> <description>I don&#039;t... I&#039;m not quite sure what &#039;leggings&#039; even means anymore. When I was little and wore leggings, they were made of stretchy cotton, not the same material that stockings and tights were made of. Are &#039;leggings&#039; now just tights without feet? If so, then I don&#039;t want people wearing them without something covering their hips.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t&#8230; I&#8217;m not quite sure what &#8216;leggings&#8217; even means anymore. When I was little and wore leggings, they were made of stretchy cotton, not the same material that stockings and tights were made of. Are &#8216;leggings&#8217; now just tights without feet? If so, then I don&#8217;t want people wearing them without something covering their hips.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Katie</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25550</link> <dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:10:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25550</guid> <description>Even better than that, the sign in the back says &quot;penis&quot; in Japanese.
On topic, the outfit is not only breaking a fundamental rule, it&#039;s also completely random and that pink is probably the most awful pukey pink I&#039;ve ever seen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even better than that, the sign in the back says &#8220;penis&#8221; in Japanese.</p><p>On topic, the outfit is not only breaking a fundamental rule, it&#8217;s also completely random and that pink is probably the most awful pukey pink I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: naomi</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25534</link> <dc:creator>naomi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25534</guid> <description>the weird ankle bagginess is incongruous with the tightness everywhere else...also wtf is that odd skirt thingy anyways?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the weird ankle bagginess is incongruous with the tightness everywhere else&#8230;also wtf is that odd skirt thingy anyways?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EricB</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/11/megan-fox-falls-foul-of-leggings-are-not-pants-rule.html#comment-25522</link> <dc:creator>EricB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=9712#comment-25522</guid> <description>I still think she can wear anyhing and nobody will notice. Only when she does not wear anything, they will notice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think she can wear anyhing and nobody will notice. Only when she does not wear anything, they will notice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
