Repeat after us, Megan: “Leggings are not pants. Leggings are not pants. Leggings are not pants.”
Not even when they have a funny little wrinkled “skirt” bit at the top, that doesn’t even cover the crotch.
NOT LEGGINGS.
Got it?
OK, as you were.
Megan Fox falls foul of “leggings are not pants” rule 
 |
|  | ||||
This entry was posted in Celebrity Fashion, Fashion Criminals and tagged leggings, megan fox Posted on | ||||||
I still think she can wear anyhing and nobody will notice. Only when she does not wear anything, they will notice.
the weird ankle bagginess is incongruous with the tightness everywhere else…also wtf is that odd skirt thingy anyways?!
Even better than that, the sign in the back says “penis” in Japanese.
On topic, the outfit is not only breaking a fundamental rule, it’s also completely random and that pink is probably the most awful pukey pink I’ve ever seen.
I don’t… I’m not quite sure what ‘leggings’ even means anymore. When I was little and wore leggings, they were made of stretchy cotton, not the same material that stockings and tights were made of. Are ‘leggings’ now just tights without feet? If so, then I don’t want people wearing them without something covering their hips.
These look more like a bad body-stocking than leggings. Plus, it looks like half of her Wonder Bra is escaping her top.
They do, don’t they? I think the weird colour is the main problem – it almost looks like skin, only skin that’s really cold and/or bruised. I think if they’d been black (or another dark colour) it would’ve looked much better (although I still think leggings are best worn with something covering the crotch!)
leggings work great as pants