Oh, Marc. Marc, Marc, Marc. Look, if you absolutely MUST stick shoes to boots, in a devlish bid to convince us that the wearer is, in fact, wearing a pair of black court shoes (and we’re not saying you SHOULD, by the way), you could at least make the boot part have the same approximate shape as a leg. Because these don’t look like shoes and tights/socks -they look like shoes and SACKS. Sacks, Marc. Who wants to wear sacks on their legs? WHO?
Is it you, readers? Do you want to wear sacks, but be able to say they’re “boots”? If so click here, and have £258 at the ready.
Marc Jacobs boots, £258
This is not pretty. Not even for shoe fetishists. How can a designer think his customers will get to shine in these shoes, erm, boots?
Now this looks really ugly.
looks like what would happen if you wore the bags you’re meant to carry the dress shoes in so that they won’t take up all that extra space in your handbag…
If they weren’t “designer”, would a single pair sell? Even for a 10th of the price?
It makes you wonder what scares them, since the stuff that’s normal for them is already the stuff of nightmares.
I’m sorry this proves once and fo all he has lost the fashion plot. Shame.
.-= CoutureCoco´s last blog ..Ivanka Trump =-.