I think this is underwear as outerwear in the sexy way! I think a full dress that merely has the appearance of attractive underwear, as opposed to a dress with bits of lingerie stuck on or actual underwear, is pretty much acceptable.
No, I can’t see myself wearing it as anything but shapewear. It looks way too much like vintage shapewear to be a dress. Though, in it’s defense, it is lovely in that role
Oooh, classic and lovely…
.-= Natasha´s last blog ..Onion Soup =-.
Doesn’t this violate the ‘underwear-as-clothing’ law? It looks like 1950s all-in-one lingerie.
Agreed!
.-= Kelly´s last blog ..Ski utenfor Rio…yeah, you betcha! =-.
double agreed. Also kinda looks like a skeleton for a dress..
.-= Ally C.´s last blog ..BRIGHTening your day-night-or-wheneveryyou’rereadingthis… =-.
I agree also! it looks like something from the spanx line or a vintage slip
.-= charles´s last blog .. =-.
I think this is underwear as outerwear in the sexy way! I think a full dress that merely has the appearance of attractive underwear, as opposed to a dress with bits of lingerie stuck on or actual underwear, is pretty much acceptable.
Also, PRETTY.
No, I can’t see myself wearing it as anything but shapewear. It looks way too much like vintage shapewear to be a dress. Though, in it’s defense, it is lovely in that role
Pretty tacky as a dress. If it were a whole lot cheaper it’d make a nice slip.
Oooh, classic and lovely…
.-= Natasha´s last blog ..<a href=”http://tastorama.com/2009/04/onion-soup.html” rel=”nofollow”>Onion Soup</a> =-.
It’s classic . . . if you like vintage lingerie.
.-= FreckleyRedhead´s last blog ..SALE 25 Percent Off – Jade and Sterling Silver Necklace – was 50 now 37.50 =-.