November 26th, 2009
Breaking (almost) every rule in the style book…
GULP.
Where to start with this one? Where to start? Any one of these items (except maybe the shoes) would’ve been bad enough on its own, but to cram all of them together on the same model like this: well, it just seems like a flagrant attempt to get her arrested, doesn’t it?
So far, we count four separate crimes and misdemeanours:
1. Visible bra
2. See-through top
3. Shoulder pads. Visible ones.
4. Leggings worn as pants.
Even this list, though, doesn’t really capture the magnitude of FUG that is this outfit. What were you thinking, MyCatwalk? WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
I think the Writing Division also need to be involved – for the almost vomit-inducingly pretentious description that includes (1) use of the word ‘voilà’ in a non-ironic context and (2) mis-spelling it as a musical instrument. Mind you I suppose (2) negates (1)…
if the ellery woman is strong, bold and fearless and believes “more is more” as the ad states…methinks she would have no problem demanding MORE fabric be present before she shells out MORE than $300 for a top lol
Whaaaa? This makes my poor brain hurt so much that I cannot find anything else to say. Whaaa?
Selina´s last blog ..A year’s worth of shoes? Count me in!
5. Spotted pants/top that look like a contagious disease
It’s a playsuit for a lazy Saturday when the whole apartment becomes your bed.
That’s an occasion when the Fashion Police is being locked out.
6. See through pants.
7. Visible panties.
Did this designed made this outfit only for you to judge it? No really, it’s just the perfect combination to call the attention of the fashion police and get arrested…
Romanticide´s last blog ..Lo último en pura prosa que leí (por gusto) fue:
Yuck, it doesn’t even attempt to match! I think the visible bra is definitely the worst. The orthopedic-esque sandals are a close second to me.
(Or, maybe they’re just poor, innocent, normal looking sandals that got caught up in the ugliness of this outfit? Who knows)
I suspect the sandals are innocent, here – not the prettiest shoes in the world, granted, but just caught up in the general fug!
poor sandals! XD
I could almost dismiss it as a routine “underwear as outerwear” violation, if not for the shoulder pads. On the outside. Kym Ellery is laughing at the “Ellery woman” until she wets herself.
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
The shoulder pads and the leggings frighten me the most. and I wonder, who thought this was a good idea??
Lyddiegal´s last blog ..Where can I find these damask print tights?
If more is more I’d rather have nothing.
Well. I like the studded leggings. And that’s it.
As a side-note: the “older posts” link at the bottom of every page has gone kabloo-ey for me. Known problem or my computer being weird?
It’s fixed now!