<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fashion Fraud Squad: Steve Madden&#8217;s &#8216;Sernya&#8217; Vs Alexander McQueen&#8217;s &#8216;Pelle&#8217; biker style boots</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: inga</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html#comment-24966</link> <dc:creator>inga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:08:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=7350#comment-24966</guid> <description>Pathetic.
&quot;Uh... sir? We can&#039;t come up with even one idea for our own shoes, so we were thinking of making an exact copy of a different shoe. Just running it by you.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic.<br
/> &#8220;Uh&#8230; sir? We can&#8217;t come up with even one idea for our own shoes, so we were thinking of making an exact copy of a different shoe. Just running it by you.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rock Hyrax</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html#comment-23141</link> <dc:creator>Rock Hyrax</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:32:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=7350#comment-23141</guid> <description>Am I the only one who&#039;s surprised anyone would want to copy a silly looking boot that&#039;s not only trying to look like a baby jacket but also has peep toes?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who&#8217;s surprised anyone would want to copy a silly looking boot that&#8217;s not only trying to look like a baby jacket but also has peep toes?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html#comment-23010</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=7350#comment-23010</guid> <description>Not that I&#039;m condoning the high price of the McQueen shoes, because I&#039;m not, but Alexander McQueen DID also have to actually come up with the design, whereas all Steve Madden had to do was copy someone &lt;em&gt;else&#039;s &lt;/em&gt;design. It&#039;s a lot easier to copy someone else than to create something from scratch, which accounts for at least a little bit of the higher price, although maybe not $1,000 worth :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m condoning the high price of the McQueen shoes, because I&#8217;m not, but Alexander McQueen DID also have to actually come up with the design, whereas all Steve Madden had to do was copy someone <em>else&#8217;s </em>design. It&#8217;s a lot easier to copy someone else than to create something from scratch, which accounts for at least a little bit of the higher price, although maybe not $1,000 worth <img
src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: naomi</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/09/steve-madden-alexander-mcqueen-knockoff-boots.html#comment-23008</link> <dc:creator>naomi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefashionpolice.net/?p=7350#comment-23008</guid> <description>clearly the extra $1024 is just for the McQ name and a bit of shoe polish as the boots above look 99.9% the same...which is cute...except for that stupid peep toe</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clearly the extra $1024 is just for the McQ name and a bit of shoe polish as the boots above look 99.9% the same&#8230;which is cute&#8230;except for that stupid peep toe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
