New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Had enough of see-through skirts? That’s too bad, because Marc Jacobs hasn’t had enough of making them. Sorry.

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Bras worn on top of clothes? Why the hell not!

 

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010 We weren’t joking, you know…

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Ladies and gentlemen, a warm welcome back for… the bum bag! (Or fanny pack, if you’re American, although that particular term still makes us snigger.)

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010 This model was backstage for so long, she grew a culture all over her body, poor thing.

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Tell the truth: you weren’t actually looking at the bag, were you?

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Neck braces are going to be huge. HUGE. And taking notes in the front row?

 New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

Of course. OF COURSE.




This entry was posted in Runway Fashion
and tagged , ,
Posted on

Read 9 comments below on “New York Fashion Week: Marc Jacobs S/S 2010

  1. OK, breaking my policy on not to comment on her: Who else is reminded of the Jem’Hadar from Star Trek? http://www.scoretrack.net/scifiles/clone3.jpg

  2. OMG! first of all:I have no apriciation for clothes that make models look blobby(imagine it on a normal person and this oddity becomes fashion monstrosity)-Marc Jacobs has made a big mistake with the bras-on-top too… I simply don’t see the point or err… statement in that design.
    And: that mask could work very well with a lizard/dragon costume!

  3. awh man… usually I love Marc Jacobs. that but a bit of a damper on my afternoon.
    ps: the phrase ‘bum bag’ actually makes me snigger, so I think we’re even. : )

    • lol! Actually, BOTH phrases make me snigger, now I come to think of it! I wish someone would come up with a less ridiculous-sounding name for these things, although perhaps it’s only right that something that LOOKS ridiculous SOUNDS ridiculous too!

      • Well, I call them belt bags. No embarrassing anatomy-related naming there. :D

        As for the fashions, they’re all hideous. Most of the materials look like they came out of somebody’s grandmother’s storage chest from 50 years ago, and what is up with the bizarre and mis-matched tops to most of the skirts/pants? 1, 2, 3, 5, & 7 all have them, and they don’t make any sense or complement the rest of the outfits in any manner at all.

        ^-.-^

  4. it all looks so cheap…too bad most of those pieces probably cost more than a month’s rent each…also who knew 1947 style undergarments would make a hot outerwear debut in 09/10?!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>