Midas Media ShoeperWoman Hey Dollface Forever Amber Keeping it Realtor Writing World Grumpy Bloggers Rubinman
graphics
graphic

July 6th, 2009

Chloe’s three-quarter length sheer pants: the worst case of VPL we’ve seen this year

Chloe-sheer-pants

On the plus side, at least this model is actually wearing underwear. On the minus side, though… we can see it. Clearly. And we don't know about you, but there's not many people whose underwear is of a huge amount of interest to us, especially not when we're out in public.

Yes, folks, just when you thought it was safe to go back to Yoox.com, the shants are back, and they're just as confusing as ever. These ones are by Chloe, and going by the design, they don't really look like they're supposed to be worn underneath something else, but we're really hoping they're not supposed to be worn like this either, because as we're sure you're all aware, not all butt cheeks are created equal, and there aren't many we'd fancy coming face to, er, cheek with as we go about our daily business.

If you'd like to show the world your wares, though, these will cost you £190, and you can buy them here.




9 Responses to “Chloe’s three-quarter length sheer pants: the worst case of VPL we’ve seen this year”

  1. gokarm says:

    good lord, will this NEVER pass? I don’t take the sheer clothing thing very seriously and rarely comment on it because I so highly doubt it will ever become an everyday thing, but CHLOE?!? I mean, these high end designers make a living on having good taste. These pants should come with a footnote explaining just wtf they’re THINKING with these shants. I SHANT be buying!

  2. Bubbles says:

    These are horrific.

  3. Zan says:

    In this economy I can barely justify buying new pants, let alone see-through ones for that astronomical price. Big sigh!

  4. spikesnsilk says:

    Dear heavens, this is verging on the obscene. And I don’t mean modesty-wise, though that could be included.

  5. Selina says:

    Wait! What? Why?
    Is it April 1st?

  6. Selina says:

    Wait! What? Why?
    Is it April 1st?

  7. Melanie says:

    I don’t care if it says Chloe on the label. They look cheap, nasty and I’d turn my nose up at them if they were in New Look.
    Is it just me or does it seem the greats fallen recently???

  8. HalfMoonMan says:

    Just what is it with women and VPL? Why do women want it to look like they are tramps and they wear no underwear? The thought of a woman in tight pants or a short skirt with no panties underneath is abhorrent to me. Who ever said VPL letting us know you are NOT going commando is a bad thing? Other women, thats all. I’ll let you in on a little secret….8 out of 10 men LOVE seeing VPL. Why do women want it to look like they are tramps and wear no underwear?
    These pants look GREAT!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fashion Police Comment Policy

> No personal attacks or abuse: criticize clothes, not people! (This includes derogatory comments about weight.)
> No self-promotion, i.e. spam
> Please keep your comments on-topic and email us directly with more general feedback/questions.
> Remember, The Fashion Police is a light-hearted site that is not intended to be taken too seriously, so any comments that break these rules will be removed.


CommentLuv Enabled





 
graphic
 
 
graphicEdinburgh Web Design
graphicSubscribe
graphicFollow Us
graphicBecome a Fan
graphicContact
graphicPrivacy Policy