July 6th, 2009
Chloe’s three-quarter length sheer pants: the worst case of VPL we’ve seen this year
On the plus side, at least this model is actually wearing underwear. On the minus side, though… we can see it. Clearly. And we don't know about you, but there's not many people whose underwear is of a huge amount of interest to us, especially not when we're out in public.
Yes, folks, just when you thought it was safe to go back to Yoox.com, the shants are back, and they're just as confusing as ever. These ones are by Chloe, and going by the design, they don't really look like they're supposed to be worn underneath something else, but we're really hoping they're not supposed to be worn like this either, because as we're sure you're all aware, not all butt cheeks are created equal, and there aren't many we'd fancy coming face to, er, cheek with as we go about our daily business.
If you'd like to show the world your wares, though, these will cost you £190, and you can buy them here.
good lord, will this NEVER pass? I don’t take the sheer clothing thing very seriously and rarely comment on it because I so highly doubt it will ever become an everyday thing, but CHLOE?!? I mean, these high end designers make a living on having good taste. These pants should come with a footnote explaining just wtf they’re THINKING with these shants. I SHANT be buying!
These are horrific.
In this economy I can barely justify buying new pants, let alone see-through ones for that astronomical price. Big sigh!
Dear heavens, this is verging on the obscene. And I don’t mean modesty-wise, though that could be included.
Wait! What? Why?
Is it April 1st?
Wait! What? Why?
Is it April 1st?
I don’t care if it says Chloe on the label. They look cheap, nasty and I’d turn my nose up at them if they were in New Look.
Is it just me or does it seem the greats fallen recently???