May 19th, 2009
Peaches Geldof is the new face – er, body – of Miss Ultimo
![Spl99395_006[1]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/Spl99395_006[1].jpg "Spl99395_006[1]")
More lingerie, this time from Ultimo, who've just launched their new 'Miss Ultimo' line, with a campaign starring the ubiquitous Peaches Geldof. She really is everywhere right now, isn't she?
The lingerie itself is a younger, fresher take on Ultimo's usual offerings, and some of the pieces are very cute. Take a look under the jump to see more of Peaches (maybe more than you'd really like to see of her, who knows) or visit the website here.
![Spl99395_013[1]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/Spl99395_013[1].jpg "Spl99395_013[1]")
![Spl99395_008[2]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/Spl99395_008[2].jpg "Spl99395_008[2]")
![Spl99395_006[1]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/6a00d8341c873353ef0115709062ef970b.jpg "Spl99395_006[1]")
![Spl99395_013[1]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/6a00d8341c873353ef0115709063eb970b.jpg "Spl99395_013[1]")
![Spl99395_008[2]](http://www.thefashionpolice.net/images/6a00d8341c873353ef011570906412970b.jpg "Spl99395_008[2]")
She does have a lovely body, but I can’t help thinking that this situation would have been made a lot better by the removal of the dishcloth from her hair.
Bit worried that the first one makes her look a bit too Winehouse-esque too.
The underwear is pretty cute (I would probably buy some of the pants if I saw them, but the bras wouldn’t be in my size).
The thing I like most, though, is that they aren’t using a super-thin model. The fact that she appears to actually have a stomach somewhere in her torso adds to the retro feel of it.
Me likey.
I like both the underwear and the turnout of the pictures.
That first one is a photoshop disaster if I’ve ever seen one. She’s missig a leg – except for the shriveled remains she’s keeping tucked behind her – and seems to have broken her wrist.
Photoshop, Photoshop, photoshop.
Einah, you’re right! Her arm does look funny in the first photo. But I still don’t get who Peaches Geldof is (i’m not from the UK). Is she a singer, an actress or what?
Madeline, why not try Google? It has the answer to just about everything, I find!
Yeah, the first one is very ‘Winehouse’, but I think it’s more of a posing disaster than photoshop. And the designs are cute.
Thank you, jen, i’ll try that
)
Um. I didn’t know diners did striptease shows. Other than the venue, I guess the underwear’s all right.
I love the underwear – it’s pretty and flirty whilst still being classy .. which makes me think it’s an incongruous model choice.
Having said that, she’s got a great bod and it fits nicely with the retro element.
Winehouse? Oh god, that no good for nothing walking disaster just have ruined for us all who like to wear smoky eyes!!!!
Definitely a Photoshop Disaster in the first one! Haha. Unless her other leg is positioned EXACTLY behind the first but even then you can’t see where the calf would go from there…
The undies are very cute.
I think it would have looked better with softer eye make up and without the daisy chain tattoo.
That tattoo is gross. That is all I have to say.
Yeah the tattoo is just too much, I agree. Imagine the pics without it! Like the first two sets of undies though. First image: Photoshop ouch, just as Einah said.
Her skin looks grey, her eyes look demonic, the pictures look stilted and awkward, and while I love tattoos I really don’t like the daisy thing she’s got going on. I think Peaches Geldof is beautiful but these photos do her no justice.
The underwear is nice, though.