May 18th, 2009
Harem pants: now available as pyjamas
Yes, it's true: the harem pant invasion of the world continues,and now not even pyjamas are safe from what we've come to think of as The Curse of the Crotch.
Actually, though, this application of the familair old saggy crotch syndrome is possiblty the only one that actually makes sense to us. After all, they're probably comfortable, and if you're wearing them in the comfort of your own home, that falls outwith the jurisdiction of The Fashion Police.
Rather than branding them Crimes of Fashion, then, we will simply note that they're £12 from Topshop. What you choose to do with that information is, of course, up to you.
I guess they’re tolerable as pyjamas. Still wouldn’t wear them, though!
nope, i don’t see any reason why i should choose them over normal pyjamas. consider it from all points of view- style, comfort, price- there is nothing that recommends them.
as PJs they dont bother me.. they look ok
I think they look like diapers at the top…I think I will stick with my oversized drawstring pants.
Good Lord, i’ve been following the harem pants trial on this website for a while so far, and I’m just wondering what kind of aesthetics they belong to. I actually used to wear harem pants a few years ago, when I was seventeen or so, before they totally invaded the fashion addict closets, but what the hell, they were TRUE, handmade, harem pants wore 50 years earlier by great-grandmmother (I’m half arabic), so authentic ones whith that sort of vintage touch that came by the fact they were a family heritage.and I guarantee that they’re NOT supposed to look that way. These are just slouchy crotch fuseaux: ugly.
there nearly sold out in blue hahaha
Yes, these are awful, but, at least, they are pjs. And know one has to see them, cause people don’t watch while your sleeping, assuming you don’t have a stalker. Just don’t wear these to a slumber party.
Perfectly acceptable as nightwear.
funny, because I had always thought that the only time I would ever where harems would be to sleep in . . .