<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dress of the Day: Cherries ruffle dress from Topshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-24173</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-24173</guid>
		<description>dont like it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont like it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocoholic</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16610</link>
		<dc:creator>chocoholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16610</guid>
		<description>I LOVE it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16609</link>
		<dc:creator>b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 09:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16609</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d prefer it if it didn&#039;t have buttons.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer it if it didn&#8217;t have buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16608</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16608</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to do the cherry thing, Pin-up Couture is the way forward.  They do a bunch of cherry print clothing and it all rocks.
Victoria: I hear you on the animal print vs. fruit print connundrum.  It&#039;s odd but irrefutable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to do the cherry thing, Pin-up Couture is the way forward.  They do a bunch of cherry print clothing and it all rocks.<br />
Victoria: I hear you on the animal print vs. fruit print connundrum.  It&#8217;s odd but irrefutable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16607</link>
		<dc:creator>Norlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16607</guid>
		<description>I dunno - the print is cute, but the cut just doesn&#039;t do anything for me. Maybe its because there&#039;s no picture of it on a model? Either way, not my favorite dress of the day.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno &#8211; the print is cute, but the cut just doesn&#8217;t do anything for me. Maybe its because there&#8217;s no picture of it on a model? Either way, not my favorite dress of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16606</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16606</guid>
		<description>Positively adorable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positively adorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeline</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16605</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16605</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t just ok. It&#039;s gorgeous. I&#039;m drooling. Too bad there&#039;s no Topshop here in Romania (good for my finances, though)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t just ok. It&#8217;s gorgeous. I&#8217;m drooling. Too bad there&#8217;s no Topshop here in Romania (good for my finances, though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16604</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16604</guid>
		<description>This has always puzzled me: it is neither ok nor particularly suiting to wear a dress/top that is full on animal print, yet it is passable for a dress/top to be full on fruit/flower print, and in some cases even looks great!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has always puzzled me: it is neither ok nor particularly suiting to wear a dress/top that is full on animal print, yet it is passable for a dress/top to be full on fruit/flower print, and in some cases even looks great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
