<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dress of the Day: Cherries ruffle dress from Topshop</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: JJ</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-24173</link> <dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:20:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-24173</guid> <description>dont like it...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont like it&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chocoholic</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16610</link> <dc:creator>chocoholic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16610</guid> <description>I LOVE it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: b.</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16609</link> <dc:creator>b.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 09:16:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16609</guid> <description>I&#039;d prefer it if it didn&#039;t have buttons. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer it if it didn&#8217;t have buttons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Melanie</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16608</link> <dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16608</guid> <description>If you&#039;re going to do the cherry thing, Pin-up Couture is the way forward.  They do a bunch of cherry print clothing and it all rocks.
Victoria: I hear you on the animal print vs. fruit print connundrum.  It&#039;s odd but irrefutable. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to do the cherry thing, Pin-up Couture is the way forward.  They do a bunch of cherry print clothing and it all rocks.<br
/> Victoria: I hear you on the animal print vs. fruit print connundrum.  It&#8217;s odd but irrefutable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Norlyn</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16607</link> <dc:creator>Norlyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16607</guid> <description>I dunno - the print is cute, but the cut just doesn&#039;t do anything for me. Maybe its because there&#039;s no picture of it on a model? Either way, not my favorite dress of the day. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno &#8211; the print is cute, but the cut just doesn&#8217;t do anything for me. Maybe its because there&#8217;s no picture of it on a model? Either way, not my favorite dress of the day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anna</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16606</link> <dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16606</guid> <description>Positively adorable. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positively adorable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Madeline</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16605</link> <dc:creator>Madeline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16605</guid> <description>It isn&#039;t just ok. It&#039;s gorgeous. I&#039;m drooling. Too bad there&#039;s no Topshop here in Romania (good for my finances, though) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t just ok. It&#8217;s gorgeous. I&#8217;m drooling. Too bad there&#8217;s no Topshop here in Romania (good for my finances, though)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Victoria</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress.html#comment-16604</link> <dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:57:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/05/dress-of-the-day-cherries-ruffle-dress-from-topshop.html#comment-16604</guid> <description>This has always puzzled me: it is neither ok nor particularly suiting to wear a dress/top that is full on animal print, yet it is passable for a dress/top to be full on fruit/flower print, and in some cases even looks great! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has always puzzled me: it is neither ok nor particularly suiting to wear a dress/top that is full on animal print, yet it is passable for a dress/top to be full on fruit/flower print, and in some cases even looks great!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
