<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wanted! Loeffler Randall circle ruffle one piece swimsuit</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: a woman</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18405</link> <dc:creator>a woman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:08:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18405</guid> <description>OH. MY. GOD.
I thank the lord, it&#039;s a swimsuit. For a moment there, Fashion Police, you had me short of breath, and not because I&#039;m impressed. I thought it was a body-suit at first glance!
But yeah, as a swimsuit, sexy!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH. MY. GOD.<br
/> I thank the lord, it&#8217;s a swimsuit. For a moment there, Fashion Police, you had me short of breath, and not because I&#8217;m impressed. I thought it was a body-suit at first glance!<br
/> But yeah, as a swimsuit, sexy!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chocoholic</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18404</link> <dc:creator>chocoholic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:55:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18404</guid> <description>I&#039;d love it as a top, as you say it&#039;d be very cute with shorts or jeans! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love it as a top, as you say it&#8217;d be very cute with shorts or jeans!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Theresa</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18403</link> <dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18403</guid> <description>I actually don&#039;t love this. I think it needs something on the other side of the suit to balance the ruffles, or the ruffles need to be placed differently. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t love this. I think it needs something on the other side of the suit to balance the ruffles, or the ruffles need to be placed differently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Heather</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18402</link> <dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/2009/03/wanted-loeffler-randall-circle-ruffle-one-piece-swimsuit.html#comment-18402</guid> <description>I think it is really cute but will only suit a very few body types (like mine wouldn&#039;t work--no chest and wide hips would look ridiculous.)  As  top it would be fine though. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is really cute but will only suit a very few body types (like mine wouldn&#8217;t work&#8211;no chest and wide hips would look ridiculous.)  As  top it would be fine though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
