Last month we asked you what you thought of Christopher Kane's scalloped detail dress, and the jury was largely in favour of it, although many of you felt it was more appropriate as a work of art than as something you'd wear.
Your work is not yet done, though, ladies and gentlemen of the Fashion Police jury, for today we want to hear your judgement on the same designer's scalloped detail trousers. These are probably a little more wearable than the dress, purely by virtue of the fact that they're a pair of black trousers, and black trousers are always going to be easier to wear than an OTT evening dress, but the question is, would you wear them?
If the answer to that is "yes", you're going to need a LOT of spare cash, because these are £1,350 at Browns.
Can these high leg jersey sandals really stand up all by themselves, without the aid of a leg? We doubt it, but even if they can, they should know that no amount of clever shoe tricks can save them now, because they have committed the crime of being sandals… with legs. As such, every time we look at them, we scratch our heads and say, "Why do they exist?"
Of course, if they CAN stand up by themselves, that's fine: they can march themselves down to the Fashion Police jail. Excellent.
Here she is, though, several months down the line, and we're pleased to see that Bai's rehabilitation seems to be coming along nicely: in fact, we can't see a single thing wrong with this outfit, can you?
Well done, Bai: we're proud of you. A few more appearances like this and you could be out of the Fashion Police jail for good!
Jessie at Denimology made a citizen's arrest on this "cardigan" (and we use that word in its loosest sense) this week, and sent it straight over to Fashion Police HQ for examination.
Having interviewed the cardigan, however, we're satisfied that it is but an innocent victim here. It's had its back snatched, and we didn't have to look very far to find out who the REAL criminal is in this case. Marc Jacobs is the man we're after, folks, for it was he who thought this would be a good idea AND that people would pay – wait for it – $985 for it. No, that figure isn't missing a decimal point.
Retailers have, of course, seen that this figure would have them charged with Daylight Robbery, and have reduced it to $178. We still can't imagine there being many takers, though, can you?
Technically, it's Sarah Jessica Parker's stylist who deserves praise for this little outfit, rather than SJP herself, because she's wearing it in-character, on the set of her new movie 'Did you hear about the Morgans'?
Still, after the split-toe boot abomination we shopped her for earlier this year, it's good to see SJP looking stylish and sophisticated, and so we're giving her the Fashion Police thumbs up here. Keep up the good work, Parker…
We’ve got to say, we actually think Amy Winehouse is looking pretty good here. We love that dress, for instance. And the shoes: how could we not love the shoes?
But for a court appearance, Amy? Does this outfit really say, “No, m’lud, I did not assault that fan?” We’re just not sure it does.
What do you think, readers? Amy is quite literally on trial today, for the alleged assault of a fan last year. The Fashion Police have no jurisdiction over her behaviour, but we are interested in her clothes, so whaddya think: appropriate for a court appearance, or… not?
Ouch. Ouchouchouch. These Jimmy Choos look like they could kill a man (or woman) with one blow from the heel. Which is why The Fashion Police are thinking of ordering some in for our officers: well, we need some kind of weapon to make sure those fashion criminals know not to mess with us, and these look much bette than a boring old gun, no?
The image is from Jimmy Choo's latest advertising campaign – you can see more of it here.