Comments on: Fashion Police Glossary: “Shress”

By: Joey Sauer

Joey Sauer — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:31:06 +0000

So ugly.
Joey Sauer´s last blog ..Survived Year 13 Camp (+ YouSayToo Awards)

By: Roseanna

Roseanna — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:53:34 +0000

just walk around naked, You might as well.

By: Inox

Inox — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:38:27 +0000

When I first saw the little picture at the top, my first thought was that the model was draped in the nasty hairballs you pull from the shower drain. Gag.

By: kevie

kevie — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:29:44 +0000

£180? Really? I keep overestimating consumers.

By: Yo

Yo — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:08:50 +0000

HAHAHAH

By: Celeste

Celeste — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:34:29 +0000

I can only imagine shresses as a sheer overlay for other dresses, since some dresses actually have that sort of thing build in. Unfortunately I’ve never seen it marketed as such, and it would probably still be ugly, so I have no idea why someone would wear it.

By: Caroline

Caroline — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:21:55 +0000

The only reason I can think of for wearing that is the bedroom…and that’s it…

By: Theresa

Theresa — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:06:14 +0000

Wow, the fact that this dress is sheer makes it awful, but the actual design of it is really god-awful.

By: gokarm

gokarm — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:02:09 +0000

The fashion industry has universally read “The Emperor’s New Clothes” and thought…hey…they might HAVE something there! Cut costs to almost 0 and charge an arm and a leg…awesome! It’s not like we could go to the grocery store and wrap ourselves in colored cellophane and achieve nearly the same look for 5 dollars.

By: Evelyn

Evelyn — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:54:38 +0000

Ew. Just. Ew.