<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madonna for Louis Vuitton: what do you think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth @ Lovely Things</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth @ Lovely Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11426</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the first two that much, but the third is just unappealing given that it&#039;s so crotch-focused - doesn&#039;t matter whether the woman&#039;s 50 or 20.
I saw that first one for the first time in Harpers this week. She&#039;s so airbrushed that while she looks very lovely in the face, I couldn&#039;t work out if it was her or just another model (and I originally thought the latter). Hiring a &#039;personality&#039;, then airbrushing out her personality? Crazy!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the first two that much, but the third is just unappealing given that it&#8217;s so crotch-focused &#8211; doesn&#8217;t matter whether the woman&#8217;s 50 or 20.<br />
I saw that first one for the first time in Harpers this week. She&#8217;s so airbrushed that while she looks very lovely in the face, I couldn&#8217;t work out if it was her or just another model (and I originally thought the latter). Hiring a &#8216;personality&#8217;, then airbrushing out her personality? Crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nj</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11425</link>
		<dc:creator>nj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11425</guid>
		<description>is it just me or does she not look like morgan fairchild circa 1983 in that last shot...poor madonna...it has to be getting hard for her to come up with new shock value after 30 odd years...her crotch has come full circle...can&#039;t you all hear lucky star and like a virgin ringing through your heads
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just me or does she not look like morgan fairchild circa 1983 in that last shot&#8230;poor madonna&#8230;it has to be getting hard for her to come up with new shock value after 30 odd years&#8230;her crotch has come full circle&#8230;can&#8217;t you all hear lucky star and like a virgin ringing through your heads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11424</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11424</guid>
		<description>Agree with Cadi. The third pic is just awful. The last thing I noticed was the purse.
Hate the robocop shoes, by the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Cadi. The third pic is just awful. The last thing I noticed was the purse.<br />
Hate the robocop shoes, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11423</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11423</guid>
		<description>Also, madonna issues aside..not much of a fan of the ad campaign regardless
Bit dark and dingyy for me, and whats with the orange fluff?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, madonna issues aside..not much of a fan of the ad campaign regardless<br />
Bit dark and dingyy for me, and whats with the orange fluff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11422</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11422</guid>
		<description>My opinion on anything madonna related is..yes well done you do look great for your age and thats wonderful but please...you don&#039;t have to swan around in lyrca bodysuits and stretch your legs as far as they&#039;ll go to show it..put it away woman!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion on anything madonna related is..yes well done you do look great for your age and thats wonderful but please&#8230;you don&#8217;t have to swan around in lyrca bodysuits and stretch your legs as far as they&#8217;ll go to show it..put it away woman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11421</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11421</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not jealousy. I can kick my legs up that high easily enough. It&#039;s the fact that I REALLY do NOT want to see 50 year old crotch.
I don&#039;t have a problem with the first two pictures. They look extremely well done. The third one...it just plain makes me shudder. It&#039;s a very unflattering angle, especially when combined with the cut of those hot pants. If she had her left knee up, so you would be staring at her hip instead of her crotch, the picture would be fine. As it is, however, the picture is extremely unflattering.
And Madge Vag is WAY too overdone. I don&#039;t want to see 50 year olds giving me crotch shots.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not jealousy. I can kick my legs up that high easily enough. It&#8217;s the fact that I REALLY do NOT want to see 50 year old crotch.<br />
I don&#8217;t have a problem with the first two pictures. They look extremely well done. The third one&#8230;it just plain makes me shudder. It&#8217;s a very unflattering angle, especially when combined with the cut of those hot pants. If she had her left knee up, so you would be staring at her hip instead of her crotch, the picture would be fine. As it is, however, the picture is extremely unflattering.<br />
And Madge Vag is WAY too overdone. I don&#8217;t want to see 50 year olds giving me crotch shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11420</link>
		<dc:creator>Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11420</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with them at all. If I could kick my leg up that high now at 27 I&#039;d be happy, and she&#039;s 50! If you&#039;ve got it flaunt it. Perhaps people are feeling a little jealous?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with them at all. If I could kick my leg up that high now at 27 I&#8217;d be happy, and she&#8217;s 50! If you&#8217;ve got it flaunt it. Perhaps people are feeling a little jealous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen-LG</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11419</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen-LG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11419</guid>
		<description>Oh sorry, these are supposed to be about the bags?! I didn&#039;t even notice the bags in the first 2!
There is nothing good to say about picture 3, 2 is OK I guess but the only thing jumping out at me from it is the shoes, not the bag. 1 is ...worrying, her head is odd, the smile is unsettling and the pose makes her look flat chested (it also looks pretty uncomfortable!)
Poor Madge &amp; LV - the campaign doesn&#039;t make her look good nor does it get the bags any attention. Shame
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sorry, these are supposed to be about the bags?! I didn&#8217;t even notice the bags in the first 2!<br />
There is nothing good to say about picture 3, 2 is OK I guess but the only thing jumping out at me from it is the shoes, not the bag. 1 is &#8230;worrying, her head is odd, the smile is unsettling and the pose makes her look flat chested (it also looks pretty uncomfortable!)<br />
Poor Madge &#038; LV &#8211; the campaign doesn&#8217;t make her look good nor does it get the bags any attention. Shame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helena</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11418</link>
		<dc:creator>Helena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11418</guid>
		<description>My goodness, PUT YOUR FANNY AWAY WOMAN!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness, PUT YOUR FANNY AWAY WOMAN!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock Hyrax</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/madonna-for-lou.html#comment-11417</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock Hyrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2617#comment-11417</guid>
		<description>#3 looks like a scene from a public information film warning of the dangers of drinking too much down the local bar/pub.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 looks like a scene from a public information film warning of the dangers of drinking too much down the local bar/pub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
