<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What are Jeggings? &#8211; a.k.a. jean leggings</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ash</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-46726</link> <dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:16:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-46726</guid> <description>Jeggings are the devil in pant form! if you want jeans just wear jeans, leggings go under things like tunics not for pairing with a singlet top. Jeggings are not flattering, anything that can make a models butt look fat...well just imagine what its doing to a normal person&#039;s.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeggings are the devil in pant form! if you want jeans just wear jeans, leggings go under things like tunics not for pairing with a singlet top. Jeggings are not flattering, anything that can make a models butt look fat&#8230;well just imagine what its doing to a normal person&#8217;s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Garnet</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-43380</link> <dc:creator>Garnet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-43380</guid> <description>They missed a perfect opportunity to market them as &quot;Leans.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They missed a perfect opportunity to market them as &#8220;Leans.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cat</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-43248</link> <dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-43248</guid> <description>I CANT WAIT to see the plus size stores start to carry these, it will be as awful as when they started making plus size shiny spandex items. lol!  If you&#039;re over a size 8, please don&#039;t but these!!  (This is coming from someone who is a size 14, just becuase something comes in your size, does NOT mean you should wear it!!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CANT WAIT to see the plus size stores start to carry these, it will be as awful as when they started making plus size shiny spandex items. lol!  If you&#8217;re over a size 8, please don&#8217;t but these!!  (This is coming from someone who is a size 14, just becuase something comes in your size, does NOT mean you should wear it!!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angel</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-42558</link> <dc:creator>angel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:19:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-42558</guid> <description>Love jeggings, think the name is cute...Its not a surprise that not every person can wear every fashion well. We all have different bodies. BUT these are adorable on the right person!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love jeggings, think the name is cute&#8230;Its not a surprise that not every person can wear every fashion well. We all have different bodies. BUT these are adorable on the right person!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nyssa</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-38639</link> <dc:creator>nyssa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:38:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-38639</guid> <description>I meant to write jean-like, not lean-like. Maybe &quot;jeggings&quot; WAS a typo!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to write jean-like, not lean-like. Maybe &#8220;jeggings&#8221; WAS a typo!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nyssa</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-38638</link> <dc:creator>nyssa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-38638</guid> <description>I also used to think denim leggings were awful, and in honesty, the picture posted on this page IS awful. But they seem to have a new incarnation as being far more like jeans - deceptively so.  I recently admired a friend&#039;s skinnies, which I really liked, and I was shocked SHOCKED when I found out they were denim leggings. The &quot;new&quot; style seem to have thicker fabric, zippers!, pockets, and have a more lean-like and less legging-like fit. I bought a pair and I LOVE them. They look just like jeans. As long as you don&#039;t buy them so tight that they are like a second skin, they would probably look pretty great on anyone that normally wears skinny jeans. (BTW - noone says &quot;skeans&quot;).
But I REFUSE to call them jeggings. Denim leggings is fine, and if I want fewer and shorter syllables, I&#039;ll call them &quot;stretch denim&quot;. (strenim, anybody?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also used to think denim leggings were awful, and in honesty, the picture posted on this page IS awful. But they seem to have a new incarnation as being far more like jeans &#8211; deceptively so.  I recently admired a friend&#8217;s skinnies, which I really liked, and I was shocked SHOCKED when I found out they were denim leggings. The &#8220;new&#8221; style seem to have thicker fabric, zippers!, pockets, and have a more lean-like and less legging-like fit. I bought a pair and I LOVE them. They look just like jeans. As long as you don&#8217;t buy them so tight that they are like a second skin, they would probably look pretty great on anyone that normally wears skinny jeans. (BTW &#8211; noone says &#8220;skeans&#8221;).</p><p>But I REFUSE to call them jeggings. Denim leggings is fine, and if I want fewer and shorter syllables, I&#8217;ll call them &#8220;stretch denim&#8221;. (strenim, anybody?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JJJ</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-35813</link> <dc:creator>JJJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-35813</guid> <description>I think most people hate jeggings because a lot of people wear them as real pants and not like leggings. There&#039;re more natural, non shiny, jeggings elsewhere and they look great with long tanks and tunics. They&#039;re also extremely comfortable and really shows off your legs</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people hate jeggings because a lot of people wear them as real pants and not like leggings. There&#8217;re more natural, non shiny, jeggings elsewhere and they look great with long tanks and tunics. They&#8217;re also extremely comfortable and really shows off your legs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ayesha</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-35644</link> <dc:creator>ayesha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-35644</guid> <description>i think that &#039;jeggings&#039; are good idea but that they&#039;re not very good in reality.
because they&#039;re really NOT very flattering at all. sure they look good on the annorexic models that stores use to advertise their clothing. but they generally don&#039;t look as good on real people!
i&#039;m proud to say that even though all my mates are wearing them, i most definately will not! i could never betray my skinnies :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that &#8216;jeggings&#8217; are good idea but that they&#8217;re not very good in reality.<br
/> because they&#8217;re really NOT very flattering at all. sure they look good on the annorexic models that stores use to advertise their clothing. but they generally don&#8217;t look as good on real people!<br
/> i&#8217;m proud to say that even though all my mates are wearing them, i most definately will not! i could never betray my skinnies <img
src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dayna...</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-32543</link> <dc:creator>dayna...</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:53:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-32543</guid> <description>Well, i think they are a good idea. The &quot;Jeggings&quot; Is a good name. It refers to Jeans, in Leggings. So when some one is talking about the &quot;Jean leggings&quot; Then the other will go, &quot;Oh, You mean the Jeggings?&quot;
They are better fitting, and is a good idea. You can actually MOVE around in them, And they will fit you for longer, as they Stretch.
I&#039;m just making an opinion. I&#039;d have to strongly disagree with you.
The look is something new and fresh, and a good idea for cheapies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i think they are a good idea. The &#8220;Jeggings&#8221; Is a good name. It refers to Jeans, in Leggings. So when some one is talking about the &#8220;Jean leggings&#8221; Then the other will go, &#8220;Oh, You mean the Jeggings?&#8221;<br
/> They are better fitting, and is a good idea. You can actually MOVE around in them, And they will fit you for longer, as they Stretch.<br
/> I&#8217;m just making an opinion. I&#8217;d have to strongly disagree with you.<br
/> The look is something new and fresh, and a good idea for cheapies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mel</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/01/jeggings.html#comment-29718</link> <dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:25:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2621#comment-29718</guid> <description>Omg! These jeggings are AWFUL! How ugly can you get?
Firstly, they DO NOT compliment the &#039;behind area&#039;. Sure they might be a great fit and comfy but they do not flatter!
Secondly, the name is really off-putting.
And third, the styles I&#039;ve seen is stores are actually quite shiny and eeww!
If want a comfy pair of leggings - get them in black. Please... I beg of you!
I&#039;m going to stick with my skinnies!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omg! These jeggings are AWFUL! How ugly can you get?</p><p>Firstly, they DO NOT compliment the &#8216;behind area&#8217;. Sure they might be a great fit and comfy but they do not flatter!</p><p>Secondly, the name is really off-putting.<br
/> And third, the styles I&#8217;ve seen is stores are actually quite shiny and eeww!<br
/> If want a comfy pair of leggings &#8211; get them in black. Please&#8230; I beg of you!</p><p>I&#8217;m going to stick with my skinnies!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
