<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geri Halliwell has a wardrobe malfunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Celeste</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12434</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12434</guid>
		<description>To give her the benefit of the doubt, a lot of fabrics that seem perfectly fine in your home are alarmingly sheer when under the glare of photographer&#039;s flashes.
Unfortunately, the more I look at the photo the less it seems like one of those times.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To give her the benefit of the doubt, a lot of fabrics that seem perfectly fine in your home are alarmingly sheer when under the glare of photographer&#8217;s flashes.<br />
Unfortunately, the more I look at the photo the less it seems like one of those times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock Hyrax</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12433</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock Hyrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12433</guid>
		<description>Call me cynical, but maybe she deliberately wore a thong with the dress in order to attention through this sort of picture...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me cynical, but maybe she deliberately wore a thong with the dress in order to attention through this sort of picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beatnik</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12432</link>
		<dc:creator>Beatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12432</guid>
		<description>Speaking of children, it should be noted that this was actually a children&#039;s charity event in England that she was attending...in front of a room full of children!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of children, it should be noted that this was actually a children&#8217;s charity event in England that she was attending&#8230;in front of a room full of children!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12431</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12431</guid>
		<description>my 8 year old son just walked up behind me and said, &quot;She needs to wear underpants.&quot;
If a child can get it, why not a grown up?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my 8 year old son just walked up behind me and said, &#8220;She needs to wear underpants.&#8221;<br />
If a child can get it, why not a grown up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorrwill</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12430</link>
		<dc:creator>lorrwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12430</guid>
		<description>I got nothing. Snarking on a Spice Girl is shooting fish in a barrel.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got nothing. Snarking on a Spice Girl is shooting fish in a barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12429</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12429</guid>
		<description>its probably just a thong and not commando.. but still.. she should have taken the time to get some red panties.. or nude coloured ones
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its probably just a thong and not commando.. but still.. she should have taken the time to get some red panties.. or nude coloured ones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mousy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mousy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12428</guid>
		<description>Woops! What happened to the ruffles, anyway? Is it the breeze as she turned around to pose?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops! What happened to the ruffles, anyway? Is it the breeze as she turned around to pose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/12/geri-halliwell.html#comment-12427</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2743#comment-12427</guid>
		<description>WHAT is with celebrities not wearing underwear? Really? Maybe this is just a tiny thong. Yes. That&#039;s better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT is with celebrities not wearing underwear? Really? Maybe this is just a tiny thong. Yes. That&#8217;s better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
