<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Maggie Gyllenhaal: mumsy or marvellous?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Diandra</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12642</link> <dc:creator>Diandra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12642</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s adorable! However, it&#039;s something she should wear to the mall or to lunch, not the red carpet. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s adorable! However, it&#8217;s something she should wear to the mall or to lunch, not the red carpet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helen-LG</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12641</link> <dc:creator>Helen-LG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:41:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12641</guid> <description>I think the hair and the tights are the problem - she shouldn&#039;t be wearing black tights with such a light dress imo. The hair is just odd too.. If she were wearing a more outlandish/overtly stylized outfit the hair would work better, it doesn&#039;t match the dress at all!
As someone else mentioned, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s very appropriate to the occasion either. It&#039;s not just what you wear, it&#039;s where you wear it! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the hair and the tights are the problem &#8211; she shouldn&#8217;t be wearing black tights with such a light dress imo. The hair is just odd too.. If she were wearing a more outlandish/overtly stylized outfit the hair would work better, it doesn&#8217;t match the dress at all!<br
/> As someone else mentioned, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very appropriate to the occasion either. It&#8217;s not just what you wear, it&#8217;s where you wear it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bookmole</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12640</link> <dc:creator>bookmole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:16:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12640</guid> <description>She looks like my mother in a photograph from the fifties.  Up to date Maggie. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks like my mother in a photograph from the fifties.  Up to date Maggie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ila, Bangalore</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12639</link> <dc:creator>ila, Bangalore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12639</guid> <description>mumsy for sure. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mumsy for sure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lorrwill</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12638</link> <dc:creator>lorrwill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12638</guid> <description>Great fashion. The colors works for her. Its a grand secretary look. I am not thrilled with the black hose and shoes but I don&#039;t hate them either.
Horrible style. Style is appropriate for the occasion which this is not. She looks like she should be shopping and lunching with friends. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great fashion. The colors works for her. Its a grand secretary look. I am not thrilled with the black hose and shoes but I don&#8217;t hate them either.<br
/> Horrible style. Style is appropriate for the occasion which this is not. She looks like she should be shopping and lunching with friends.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Veronika</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12637</link> <dc:creator>Veronika</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12637</guid> <description>I actually like the dress.. but the HAIR, why? Why oh why? Could have been much much better. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the dress.. but the HAIR, why? Why oh why? Could have been much much better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amanda Nicole</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12636</link> <dc:creator>Amanda Nicole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12636</guid> <description>Natasha: That&#039;s exactly what I was thinking! And what&#039;s with her hair here? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha: That&#8217;s exactly what I was thinking! And what&#8217;s with her hair here?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natasha</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/maggie-gyllenha.html#comment-12635</link> <dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2775#comment-12635</guid> <description>I&#039;m not keen on Maggie&#039;s style here or in general. For me she&#039;s usually just a milder version of Chloe Sevigny. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not keen on Maggie&#8217;s style here or in general. For me she&#8217;s usually just a milder version of Chloe Sevigny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
