<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low cut tops: how low will you go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lazagna</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-21912</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazagna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-21912</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go as low as I can without my bra showing. I will NOT go without one, that&#039;s just sloppy. And any time you need double sided tape is indeed a big clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go as low as I can without my bra showing. I will NOT go without one, that&#8217;s just sloppy. And any time you need double sided tape is indeed a big clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12698</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12698</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll wear really low tops, but then I never have to worry about cleavage.  However the low, and loose top would be concerning for even me.  I usually don&#039;t go lower than what a plunge bra would allow, though keyholes are an option.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll wear really low tops, but then I never have to worry about cleavage.  However the low, and loose top would be concerning for even me.  I usually don&#8217;t go lower than what a plunge bra would allow, though keyholes are an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12697</link>
		<dc:creator>Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12697</guid>
		<description>oh yeah, the dress above - too low, for me, and I suspect (and hope) for my sister...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, the dress above &#8211; too low, for me, and I suspect (and hope) for my sister&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12696</guid>
		<description>I tend to steer away from low cut tops as I don&#039;t want to look trampy, but my twin sister wears them all the time and she never seems to look trampy... I guess its as much about how you feel as how you look.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to steer away from low cut tops as I don&#8217;t want to look trampy, but my twin sister wears them all the time and she never seems to look trampy&#8230; I guess its as much about how you feel as how you look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fashion Police</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12695</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12695</guid>
		<description>My problem is that I apparently have a freakishly short torso, because absolutely EVERYTHING is too low on me. Seriously, I buy ordinary, v-necked shirts and I have to pin them to my bra when I go out, or the girls are OUT. Cami tops have become my best friend :) And the dress above? Would honestly reach my belly button. It&#039;s no fun, I tells ya.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem is that I apparently have a freakishly short torso, because absolutely EVERYTHING is too low on me. Seriously, I buy ordinary, v-necked shirts and I have to pin them to my bra when I go out, or the girls are OUT. Cami tops have become my best friend <img src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And the dress above? Would honestly reach my belly button. It&#8217;s no fun, I tells ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12694</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12694</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a 34DD. I can&#039;t wear things that are very low cut, the girls pretty much look like they&#039;re escaping. If I can look down my own shirt and see my bra, it&#039;s too low cut.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a 34DD. I can&#8217;t wear things that are very low cut, the girls pretty much look like they&#8217;re escaping. If I can look down my own shirt and see my bra, it&#8217;s too low cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12693</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12693</guid>
		<description>1st sentence:  by = &quot;but&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st sentence:  by = &#8220;but&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12692</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a B cup by my girls are of the shape that really look a lot better when fully supported.  So anything that shows off my VS Biofit bra is out.  But as others have said, considered the size of my rack, lower-cut tops don&#039;t tend to look too trampy on me, as long as I don&#039;t go REALLLLLY low (and my definition of &quot;realllllly low&quot; does include the above dress).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a B cup by my girls are of the shape that really look a lot better when fully supported.  So anything that shows off my VS Biofit bra is out.  But as others have said, considered the size of my rack, lower-cut tops don&#8217;t tend to look too trampy on me, as long as I don&#8217;t go REALLLLLY low (and my definition of &#8220;realllllly low&#8221; does include the above dress).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12691</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that is has to do with the size of your chest. I&#039;m an H cup and there is NO WAY I can wear the same things as my A and B cup friends. What looks cute on them looks incredibly skanky on me. And it also depends if your bra is the lift-and-separate kind, or if it&#039;s a push-up shoving your b00bs together! You can wear a lower neckline the more separated they are.
In general, I err on the side of less cleavage. I&#039;d rather be buttoned up a bit too high than to have people think I&#039;m a big slut. My BF is trying to work with me on it, because a lot of shirts I don&#039;t like to wear, he thinks are perfectly appropriate for a bar or something.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that is has to do with the size of your chest. I&#8217;m an H cup and there is NO WAY I can wear the same things as my A and B cup friends. What looks cute on them looks incredibly skanky on me. And it also depends if your bra is the lift-and-separate kind, or if it&#8217;s a push-up shoving your b00bs together! You can wear a lower neckline the more separated they are.<br />
In general, I err on the side of less cleavage. I&#8217;d rather be buttoned up a bit too high than to have people think I&#8217;m a big slut. My BF is trying to work with me on it, because a lot of shirts I don&#8217;t like to wear, he thinks are perfectly appropriate for a bar or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/low-cut-tops-ho.html#comment-12690</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2783#comment-12690</guid>
		<description>Thankyou fashion police :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou fashion police <img src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
