<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Kate Winslet on the cover of Vanity Fair December 08 &#8211; what do you think?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Diana</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13161</link> <dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:21:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13161</guid> <description>WOW. She reminds me of Sharon Stone.. but I think Kate is much prettier and she looks fantastic here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. She reminds me of Sharon Stone.. but I think Kate is much prettier and she looks fantastic here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: edith</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13160</link> <dc:creator>edith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13160</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t have recognised her, sorry...
Other than that, I do like the style of the picture but dislike the endless magazin covers of heavily photoshopped celebrities. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have recognised her, sorry&#8230;<br
/> Other than that, I do like the style of the picture but dislike the endless magazin covers of heavily photoshopped celebrities.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: E.</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13159</link> <dc:creator>E.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13159</guid> <description>Just to clarify: I like Kate Winslet, I think she&#039;s stunningly beautiful. That&#039;s why it&#039;s such a shame. I didn&#039;t even recognize her here. Never had the intention of being mean, though. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify: I like Kate Winslet, I think she&#8217;s stunningly beautiful. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s such a shame. I didn&#8217;t even recognize her here. Never had the intention of being mean, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Veronika</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13158</link> <dc:creator>Veronika</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:29:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13158</guid> <description>I think she looks bloody great.. and it&#039;s not unrecognizable since you did all recognize her, no? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she looks bloody great.. and it&#8217;s not unrecognizable since you did all recognize her, no?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rock Hyrax</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13157</link> <dc:creator>Rock Hyrax</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:03:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13157</guid> <description>I like the general look and imagine it would suit Kate Winslet.  I actually think it&#039;s insulting to her to do such a big photoshop job - I mean, how would you feel if you were photographed for a magazine cover and they made you unrecognisable? - you&#039;d end up thinking you&#039;re ugly.  (Oh wait, apparently just like a large proportion of the readers end up feeling, having looked at endless photoshopped pictures...) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the general look and imagine it would suit Kate Winslet.  I actually think it&#8217;s insulting to her to do such a big photoshop job &#8211; I mean, how would you feel if you were photographed for a magazine cover and they made you unrecognisable? &#8211; you&#8217;d end up thinking you&#8217;re ugly.  (Oh wait, apparently just like a large proportion of the readers end up feeling, having looked at endless photoshopped pictures&#8230;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amanda</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13156</link> <dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13156</guid> <description>I think she looks absolutely gorgeous!  I think that it might have been photo shopped a little bit, but the last time I remember seeing Kate was in Titanic =) HAHA!  Either way she looks beautiful! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she looks absolutely gorgeous!  I think that it might have been photo shopped a little bit, but the last time I remember seeing Kate was in Titanic =) HAHA!  Either way she looks beautiful!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Heather</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13155</link> <dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13155</guid> <description>Wow, that is so heavily photoshopped that my husband (who is as big of a Kate Winslett fan as I) didn&#039;t even recognize her. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is so heavily photoshopped that my husband (who is as big of a Kate Winslett fan as I) didn&#8217;t even recognize her.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13154</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13154</guid> <description>Natasha, to be honest I think it&#039;s a shame that people can&#039;t even comment that a photo has been photoshopped (which it clearly has - as you say yourself, every magazine cover is photoshopped to some extent) without being called &quot;mean&quot; for it.  I don&#039;t think anyone intends to be offensive: in fact, most people have said that she looks stunning, albeit different - and a lot of that is due to the styling of the shot. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha, to be honest I think it&#8217;s a shame that people can&#8217;t even comment that a photo has been photoshopped (which it clearly has &#8211; as you say yourself, every magazine cover is photoshopped to some extent) without being called &#8220;mean&#8221; for it.  I don&#8217;t think anyone intends to be offensive: in fact, most people have said that she looks stunning, albeit different &#8211; and a lot of that is due to the styling of the shot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Katrina</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13153</link> <dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13153</guid> <description>The wavy hair/dark brows/scantily clad-ness reminds me of a &quot;Show Girls&quot; era Elizabeth Berkley. And not in a good way.
http://ima.dada.net/image/medium/2111500.jpg </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wavy hair/dark brows/scantily clad-ness reminds me of a &#8220;Show Girls&#8221; era Elizabeth Berkley. And not in a good way.<br
/> http://ima.dada.net/image/medium/2111500.jpg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natasha</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/11/kate-winslet-on.html#comment-13152</link> <dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:34:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2859#comment-13152</guid> <description>I think the photoshop comments are kinda mean. Kate has always had great skin, and she is naturally stunning. As far as her body is concerned, it&#039;s covered by the coat. I imagine that every cover has to be airbrushed at least a little bit, but I certainly don&#039;t think Kate looks unrecognizable. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the photoshop comments are kinda mean. Kate has always had great skin, and she is naturally stunning. As far as her body is concerned, it&#8217;s covered by the coat. I imagine that every cover has to be airbrushed at least a little bit, but I certainly don&#8217;t think Kate looks unrecognizable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
